Key result
AVR resolves ventricular bigeminy and normalizes ocular pulse amplitude to ~2 mmHg in one patient.
Why the study?
The relationship between irregular ocular pressure waveforms with elevated ocular pulse amplitude and underlying cardiac conditions was investigated.
Case Report (n=1)
Ocular pressure waveforms directly reflect hemodynamics and may provide an opportunity for screening subjects for cardiovascular anomalies and arrhythmias.
Ocular pulse amplitude may reflect aortic valve disease and arrhythmias; leaves open its screening utility pending larger studies.
Ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) is defined as the difference between maximum and minimum intraocular pressure (IOP) during a cardiac cycle. Average values of OPA range from 1 to 4 mmHg. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the source of an irregular IOP waveform with elevated OPA in a 48-year-old male. Ocular pressure waveforms had an unusual shape consistent with early ventricular contraction. With a normal IOP, OPA was 9 mmHg, which is extraordinarily high. The subject was examined by a cardiologist and was determined to be in ventricular bigeminy. In addition, he had bounding carotid pulses and echocardiogram confirmed aortic insufficiency. After replacement of the aortic valve, the bigeminy resolved and the ocular pulse waveform became regular in appearance with an OPA of 1.6-2.0 mmHg. The ocular pressure waveform is a direct reflection of hemodynamics. Evaluating this waveform may provide an additional opportunity for screening subjects for cardiovascular anomalies and arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberts et al. (2015) conducted a case report in Ventricular bigeminy and aortic insufficiency (n=1). Aortic valve replacement vs. Pre-operative state was evaluated on Ocular pulse amplitude (OPA) and waveform regularity. Aortic valve replacement resolved ventricular bigeminy and normalized the extraordinarily high ocular pulse amplitude from 9 mmHg to 1.6-2.0 mmHg in a 48-year-old male.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: