Key result
Moderate PPM does not worsen survival or LV mass reduction in patients over 75 post-AVR.
Why the study?
Age-related comorbidities increase risk of aortic root enlargement to avoid prosthesis-patient mismatch in elderly patients undergoing AVR for AS, but the impact of moderate PPM on long-term outcomes is unclear.
Does moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch negatively impact long-term survival and echocardiographic outcomes in elderly patients undergoing conventional aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis?
Cohort (n=40)
No
Does moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch negatively impact long-term survival and echocardiographic outcomes in elderly patients undergoing conventional aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis?
p-value: p=0.87
Moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch does not appear to negatively influence long-term survival or left ventricular mass regression in elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
May support root enlargement in select elderly AS patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Together with aging of the Japanese population, aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS) is now becoming more and more common in the elderly. When the aortic annulus is too small to allow an adequate sized prosthetic valve, aortic root enlargement is required to avoid prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). However, age-related comorbidities including aortic root calcification bring significant risk in performing aortic root enlargement. In the present study, 40 patients aged 75 years or more who underwent AVR for AS were reviewed to determine whether moderate PPM has a negative impact on the long-term results. Operative mortality occurred in 2 patients (5%) and moderate PPM occurred in 8 patients. There was no significant difference in survival between cases with and without PPM (P = 0.87). Both aortic pressure gradient (PG) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) measured by echocardiography were signifi cantly decreased in patients with and without PPM. Reduction of PG was significantly greater in patients with PPM than without PPM (P = 0.02). Reduction of LVMI was not different between the groups (P = 0.58). Moderate PPM did not negatively influence survival or reduction of PG or LVMI in patients aged 75 years or older who underwent AVR for AS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitamura et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Aortic Stenosis (n=40). Moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch vs. No prosthesis-patient mismatch was evaluated on Survival (p=0.87). Moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch did not negatively influence survival (P=0.87) or reduction of pressure gradient and left ventricular mass index in patients aged 75 years or older undergoing aortic valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: