Key result
Exercise-duration equations fail to accurately predict VO2max in young adults, explaining only ~50% of variance.
Why the study?
The accuracy of exercise-duration based prediction equations and a nomogram to estimate VO2max in healthy young adults was uncertain.
Can VO2max be accurately estimated using exercise-duration based prediction equations and a nomogram in healthy young adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=550)
No
Can VO2max be accurately estimated using exercise-duration based prediction equations and a nomogram in healthy young adults?
Effect estimate: R2 0.38-0.50
Exercise-duration based prediction equations and nomograms are inaccurate for estimating VO2max in healthy young adults compared to direct measurement.
These equations should not replace direct VO2max measurement in young adults; leaves open development of improved, population-specific models.
Study aim : The purpose of this study was to examine a large cohort of young Canadian adults to determine if exercise time from a maximal Bruce Treadmill Protocol could accurately predict measured VO 2max values by inputting the total exercise time into prediction equations and a nomogram. Materials and methods : 550 kinesiology undergraduate student (280 male and 270 female) participants, with a mean body mass (BM) of 72.08 ± 15.05 kg, mean age of 21.16 ± 1.26 years old and mean height of 171.95 ± 10.25 cm completed a maximal graded exercise test to obtain their VO 2max (measured). Predicted VO 2max was calculated with various equations using the variable of total exercise test time. Linear regression models were created to determine how well the predicted VO2max values compared to the measured values. Results : Across all VO 2max calculation methods, males obtained higher VO2max values on both the measured (49.89 ± 9.21 mL/ kg/min) and predicted values (46.04–55.40 mL/kg/min) and exercised for a longer duration of time (14.33 minutes) compared to females (40.89 ± 7.50 mL/kg/min, 38.87–48.36 mL/kg/min, 11.92 minutes). Classifications and percentile rankings were created using each measured and predicted method. Conclusions : The Healthy Persons Equation [6], Healthy Men and Women Equation [2], Active and Sedentary Women/Men Equations [10, 22] and nomogram [13] cannot accurately predict VO 2max in healthy young adults, with R 2 values between 0.38–0.50. The Healthy Persons Equation [6] was found to very closely mimic the seven-category classifications determined from the measured CPET VO2max values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adam et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy young adults (n=550). Exercise-duration based prediction equations and nomogram vs. Measured VO2max using computerized instrumentation on a metabolic cart was evaluated on Accuracy of predicted VO2max compared to measured VO2max (Coefficient of Determination, R2) (R2 0.38-0.50). Exercise-duration based prediction equations and a nomogram cannot accurately predict VO2max in healthy young adults, explaining only 38% to 50% of the variance compared to measured values.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: