Key result
Heart failure linked to ~7-fold higher serum CA125, especially in decompensated patients with serosal effusion.
Why the study?
The relationship between serum CA125 levels and heart failure status, echocardiographic parameters, and BNP levels was not well characterized.
Are serum CA125 levels elevated in patients with heart failure and do they correlate with BNP and echocardiographic parameters?
Observational (n=76)
Are serum CA125 levels elevated in patients with heart failure and do they correlate with BNP and echocardiographic parameters?
Absolute Event Rate: 71.05% vs 10.75%
p-value: p=<0.0005
Serum CA125 is significantly elevated in decompensated heart failure, particularly in the presence of serosal effusions, and correlates with BNP, suggesting its utility as a marker of systemic congestion.
OBJECTIVE: To assess serum levels of tumor marker carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) in patients with heart failure (HF) and to investigate possible correlation with echocardiographic parameters and level of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 76 patients with different cardiac symptoms hospitalized at Clinic for heart disease and rheumatism. Control group (n = 26) was consisted of patients without signs and symptoms of HF, normal left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and normal BNP level. Patients with diagnosis of HF (n = 50) were subdivided into 2 group depending on signs and symptoms of fluid overload: compensated (compHF, n = 10) and decompensated group (decompHF, n = 40). Serum CA125 and BNP were measured on admission and all patient underwent ECG recording and trans thoracic echocardiographic examination. RESULTS: The median CA125 level in HF group was significantly higher compared to control group (71.05 [30.70-141.47]U/ml vs 10.75 [8.05- 14.32] U/ml, p < 0.0005). Higher CA125 levels were found in decompHF group compared to compHF group (94.90 [49.75-196.75]U/ml vs 11.90 [10.25-15.80]U/ml, p < 0.0005). In decompHF group 13 of patients had pleural and/or pericardial effusion- their CA125 levels were significantly higher compared to patients without serosal effusion (n = 27) (205.10 [106.50-383.90]U/ml vs. 71.50 [47.30-109.55] U/ml, p < 0.002). We found significant difference in CA125 levels between patients with atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm (98.40 [48.20-242.70] U/ml vs. 47.30 [12.95-99.05] U/ml, p = 0.015). There was no significant difference in CA125 levels in group with enlarged left atrium compared to normal sized atrium (p = 0.282), as well as in group with moderate/severe mitral regurgitation compared to group with no/mild mitral regurgitation (p = 0.99). Finally, levels of serum CA125 positively correlated with serum level of BNP (r = 0.293, p = 0.039), but not with LVEF (p = 0.369) and left atrium diameter (p = 0.636). CONCLUSION: Serum CA125 is elevated in decompensated HF patients: more pronounced elevation was found in patients with pleural and/or pericard effusion compared to patients with no serosal effusion. CA125 level correlated with BNP, but not with left atrium diameter nor with LVEF. Tumor marker CA125 could be used as a marker of systemic congestion and volume overload in decompensated HF. We hypothesized that high CA125 level indicates that measured high BNP is actually wet BNP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Durak-Nalbantić et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=76). Heart failure vs. Patients without signs and symptoms of HF, normal LVEF and normal BNP level was evaluated on Serum CA125 level (p=<0.0005). Heart failure was associated with significantly elevated serum CA125 levels compared to controls (median 71.05 vs 10.75 U/ml; P<0.0005), particularly in decompensated patients with serosal effusion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: