Key result
Patients with heart failure and recovered ejection fraction demonstrated an additional 4.0% increase in LVEF over 1 year (95% CI 0.15-7.90; P=0.042) compared to those with persistent HFrEF.
Why the study?
Factors associated with long-term recovery of LVEF in patients with HFrEF and the occurrence of further LVEF improvement in this group were not well defined.
Do patients with previously recovered LVEF experience further LVEF improvement and different troponin trajectories compared to those with persistent HFrEF?
Cohort (n=316)
Do patients with previously recovered LVEF experience further LVEF improvement and different troponin trajectories compared to those with persistent HFrEF?
Mean Difference: 4 (95% CI 0.15–7.9)
p-value: p=0.042
Patients with recovered LVEF show continued late improvement in LVEF and stable troponin levels, unlike those with persistent HFrEF who experience rising troponin and no LVEF improvement.
May justify serial LVEF monitoring in recovered EF; extends observational data but leaves open effects on outcomes.
AIMS: The aim of this study is to determine factors associated with long-term recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF) and if further recovery also occurs in this group. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 621 participants enrolled in the Alberta Heart Failure Etiology and Analysis Team (HEART) Study, 316 with Stage C HF underwent comprehensive imaging and biomarker testing at enrolment and at 1-year follow up. Using pre-enrolment data, HF with recovered EF (HFrecEF) was defined as an absolute improvement ≥5% in LVEF from the prior lowest LVEF value, with a final LVEF value > 35% at or prior to study baseline. Participants with all LVEF > 40% were included for comparison. Hospitalization-free survival to 5 years was performed. The median cohort age was 66 years, and time from diagnosis was 4 years; 82% were male patients. Of the 316 patients, 95 (30%) patients had HFrecEF and 56 (18%) patients pHFrEF. On multivariate analysis, only shorter duration of HF was predictive of HFrecEF status. Over 1 year, LVEF increased in the HFrecEF group 4.0% (0.15-7.90, P = 0.042) as compared with persistent HFrEF, who in turn demonstrated higher baseline serum high sensitivity Troponin-T with further increase at follow up 0.55(0.33-0.86, P = 0.011). No change in any parameter in the HFpEF/HFmrEF group at follow up was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HFrecEF demonstrate evidence of additional late improvement in LVEF and unchanged troponin levels, in contrast to those with persistent HFrEF, where LVEF does not improve and serum troponin rises over time. These data help to inform mechanisms relating to late LV remodelling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Howlett et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=316). Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) vs. Persistent HFrEF was evaluated on Change in LVEF over 1 year (MD 4.0, 95% CI 0.15-7.90, p=0.042). Patients with heart failure and recovered ejection fraction demonstrated an additional 4.0% increase in LVEF over 1 year (95% CI 0.15-7.90; P=0.042) compared to those with persistent HFrEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: