Key result
Atrial correlation-waveform analysis using a sinus-rhythm template distinguishes VT from SVT with 100% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Distinguishing ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia using correlation-waveform analysis of atrial and ventricular electrograms was evaluated to improve rhythm classification.
Does correlation-waveform analysis of atrial and ventricular electrograms accurately distinguish ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia in patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing?
Observational (n=22)
Does correlation-waveform analysis of atrial and ventricular electrograms accurately distinguish ventricular tachycardia from supraventricular tachycardia in patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing?
Absolute Event Rate: 93% vs 66%
p-value: p=0.0034
Atrial correlation-waveform analysis matching is superior to ventricular matching for discriminating between supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia.
We tested the use of correlation-waveform analysis (CWA) of atrial and ventricular electrograms (EGMs) to distinguish ventricular tachycardia (VT) from supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing were enrolled. EGMs recorded during induced tachycardias were compared with EGMs recorded during sinus and paced rhythms, taken as templates, by assigning a CWA percent-match (CPM) score. Twenty-two patients were studied: 15 men and 7 women (mean age 48 years); 16 with SVT and 6 with VT. Using a sinus-rhythm template, the atrial CPM scores for SVT and VT were 66%+/- 20% and 93%+/- 5%, respectively (P = 0.0034). With a CPM-score cutoff of 85%, the sensitivity for correctly identifying VT was 100% and the specificity for rejection of SVT was 80%. The corresponding ventricular-CPM scores for SVT and VT were 81%+/- 12% and 72%+/- 24%, respectively (P = 0.13, cutoff = 65%, sensitivity = 50%, and specificity = 90%). Using a ventricular template with atrial pacing, the ventricular-CPM scores for SVT and VT were 87%+/- 9% and 76%+/- 14%, respectively (P = 0.028, cutoff = 70%, sensitivity = 50%, and specificity = 93%). Atrial CWA matching is superior to ventricular CWA matching in discriminating between SVT and VT. CWA matching in both chambers could potentially achieve better discrimination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saba et al. (2005) conducted an observational in Ventricular tachycardia and supraventricular tachycardia (n=22). Correlation-waveform analysis (CWA) of atrial and ventricular electrograms was evaluated on Atrial CPM score using a sinus-rhythm template (p=0.0034). Atrial correlation-waveform analysis using a sinus-rhythm template distinguished VT from SVT with scores of 93% vs 66% (P=0.0034), yielding 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity at an 85% cutoff.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: