Key result
Ticagrelor is linked to ~526% higher major bleeding risk vs clopidogrel in octogenarians, without ischemic benefit.
Why the study?
Octogenarians undergoing PCI have a higher ischemic burden and bleeding risk, but the comparative efficacy and safety of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor in this group without atrial fibrillation is unclear.
Does ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel improve ischemic outcomes or increase bleeding in octogenarian patients without atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cohort (n=226)
Yes
Does ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel improve ischemic outcomes or increase bleeding in octogenarian patients without atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
In octogenarians undergoing PCI, ticagrelor significantly increases the risk of major and minor bleeding without providing an ischemic or mortality benefit compared to clopidogrel.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Optimal DAPT in octogenarians post-PCI remains uncertain; leaves open whether ticagrelor improves net outcomes versus clopidogrel.
Introduction: Dual antiplatelet therapy is routinely recommended to prevent stent restenosis and reduce ischemic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. Octogenarians have a higher ischemic burden than younger patients on moreover they have a higher risk of bleeding. Therefore, we intended to analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel and the potent P2Y12 inhibitor ticagrelor in octogenarians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention without atrial fibrillation. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed records from three local research hospitals. In our study, 226 patients aged 80 years or older undergoing had coronary intervention for both acute coronary syndrome and stable coronary artery disease were included after the exclusion criteria had been applied between January 2019 and April 2021. Results: The median dual antiplatelet therapy duration was similar between two groups. 84.3% of patients in the clopidogrel group and 56.7% of patients in the ticagrelor group had no bleeding at one year follow-up, which was statistically significant (p<0.001). The minor bleeding rate was significantly higher among patients receiving ticagrelor (21.7%) compared to those receiving clopidogrel (7.2%; p=0.02). Also, the rate of major bleeding was significantly higher in patients receiving ticagrelor (20.0%) than in patients receiving clopidogrel (7.8%; p<0.010). Rates of all-cause death and ischemic endpoints were similar in both treatment groups at one year follow-up. Conclusions: Clopidogrel and ticagrelor were similar in terms of all-cause mortality and ischemic events with increased rates of all types of bleeding in patients treated with ticagrelor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çiçekçioğlu et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=226). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Major bleeding (OR 6.257, 95% CI 2.225-17.592, p=0.001). Ticagrelor was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding compared to clopidogrel in octogenarian patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, with no difference in ischemic events.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: