Key result
Sacubitril-valsartan, SGLT2 inhibitors, and transthyretin stabilizers substantially improve outcomes in chronic heart failure.
Why the study?
After more than a decade of modest advancements, recent rapid developments in chronic heart failure therapies necessitate an updated review for clinical practice.
This review summarizes recent therapeutic advancements in chronic heart failure to update general practitioners on novel treatment implementations.
May inform chronic HF management updates; extends prior syntheses but leaves open optimal implementation and durability questions.
After more than a decade of relatively modest advancements, heart failure therapeutic development has accelerated, with the PARADIGM-HF trial and the SHIFT trial demonstrated significant reductions in cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization for sacubitril-valsartan and in heart failure hospitalization alone for ivabradine. Several heart failure therapies have since received or stand on the verge of market approval and promise substantive advances in the treatment of chronic heart failure. Some of these improve clinical outcomes, whereas others improve functional or patient-reported outcomes. In light of these rapid advances in the care of adults living with chronic heart failure, in this review we seek to update the general practitioner on novel heart failure therapies. Specifically, we will review recent data on the implementation of sacubitril-valsartan, treatment of functional mitral regurgitation, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor therapy, agents for transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy, treatment of iron deficiency in heart failure, and the use of biomarkers or remote hemodynamic monitoring to guide heart failure therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buckley et al. (2019) conducted a review in chronic heart failure. Novel heart failure therapies was evaluated. Recent therapeutic developments, including sacubitril-valsartan, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and transthyretin stabilizers, have provided substantive advances in improving outcomes in chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: