Key result
COR-KNOT automated fasteners linked to a ~49-minute decrease in CPB time vs hand-tied knots.
Why the study?
There is currently no consensus on the role of the COR-KNOT automated suture fastener in heart valve surgery compared with hand-tied knots.
Does an automated suture fastener reduce operative times and improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing heart valve surgery compared to hand-tied knots?
Cohort (n=693)
No
Does an automated suture fastener reduce operative times and improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing heart valve surgery compared to hand-tied knots?
Mean Difference: -49
Absolute Event Rate: 70.5% vs 220%
p-value: p=0.006
The use of an automated suture fastener in heart valve surgery significantly reduces cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times without negatively affecting clinical outcomes.
May shorten operative times in sternotomy valve surgery; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice without RCTs.
Objective The COR-KNOT® device is an automated suture fastener in which there is currently no consensus on its role in heart valve surgery. Our aim was thus to conduct a one-to-one comparison of clinical outcomes with a hand-tied control cohort. Methods We performed a single-center, cumulative propensity-matched retrospective cohort study on patients undergoing heart valve surgery from 1 January 2015 to 13 February 2020. Propensity score matching was performed on 693 patients, dividing them into matched COR-KNOT® ( n = 124) and hand-tied ( n = 124) groups. Results Data on baseline demographics, operative details, and clinical outcomes were analyzed and compared between the groups. The patients in both the COR-KNOT® and control groups were well-matched. For the median sternotomy (MS) all procedures subgroup, use of COR-KNOT® was associated with a decrease of around 49 min in CPB time (220.00 [168.00 to 256.00] vs 70.50 [134.00 to 236.75] min, P = 0.006) and around 32 min in ACC time (145.00 [109.00 to 189.00] vs 112.50 [81.00 to 161.75] min, P = 0.008). In the MS valve and CABG subgroup, use of COR-KNOT® was associated with a 70 min reduction in overall operation time (401.00 [354.25 to 468.75] vs 330.50 [288.50 to 370.50] min, P = 0.013), 63 min reduction in CPB time (216.50 [191.75 to 283.25] vs 153.00 [124.75 to 207.50] min, P = 0.004) and 45 min reduction in ACC time (146.00 [134.50 to 205.50] vs 100.50 [71.50 to 150.75] min, P = 0.003). Conclusions In heart valve surgery, use of the automated suture fastener was associated with shorter CPB and ACC times. Additionally, we determined that clinical outcomes are most likely unaffected by the use of COR-KNOT®.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ler et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Heart valve surgery (n=693). COR-KNOT automated suture fastener vs. Hand-tied knot was evaluated on Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time in median sternotomy procedures (49 min decrease, p=0.006). In patients undergoing heart valve surgery, use of the COR-KNOT automated suture fastener was associated with a 49-minute decrease in cardiopulmonary bypass time compared to hand-tied knots (P=0.006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: