Key result
Near-field to first-deflection distance ≤8 mm strongly predicts acute success within ≤5 RF applications.
Why the study?
The spatial discrepancy between earliest activation sites identified by first-deflection and near-field annotations may represent a practical marker of ablation difficulty in idiopathic ventricular premature contractions.
Does the NF-FD distance predict procedural complexity and ablation outcome in patients undergoing catheter ablation for idiopathic VPCs?
Observational (n=26)
Does the NF-FD distance predict procedural complexity and ablation outcome in patients undergoing catheter ablation for idiopathic VPCs?
A longer distance between near-field and first-deflection earliest activation sites predicts greater procedural difficulty during ablation of idiopathic VPCs.
May aid prediction of ablation complexity in idiopathic VPCs; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Background Catheter ablation is established for idiopathic ventricular premature contractions (VPCs), but elimination may be difficult when the arrhythmogenic substrate is deep within the myocardium. The spatial discrepancy between earliest activation sites identified by first-deflection (FD) and near-field (NF) annotations may represent a practical marker of ablation difficulty. Objective To evaluate whether the NF-FD distance predicts procedural complexity and ablation outcome in idiopathic VPC ablation. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 26 patients with idiopathic VPCs who underwent catheter ablation using the EnSite mapping system (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) with a high-density grid catheter. The NF-FD distance was calculated on the three-dimensional electroanatomic map. Results Acute success was achieved in 25 patients (96%). Patients with VPC elimination within 5 RF applications had a significantly shorter NF-FD distance than those requiring more (4.7 ± 4.5 mm vs. 20.3 ± 5.6 mm, P < 0.001). ROC analysis showed that NF-FD ≤8 mm predicted the composite endpoint of ≤5 applications and acute success with an AUC of 0.932 (95% CI: 0.837–1.000)) (sensitivity 0.90, specificity 0.86). NF-FD distance correlated significantly with RF applications (R = 0.771), ablation duration (R = 0.801), and total delivered energy (R = 0.816; all P < 0.001). NF-FD distance did not differ between chronic-phase success and recurrence groups (7.6 ± 8.1 mm vs. 10.0 ± 9.0 mm, P=0.352). Conclusion A longer NF-FD distance was associated with greater procedural difficulty; Chronic-phase success remained comparable when sufficient ablation was performed, suggesting that a long NF-FD distance should not discourage continued lesion delivery for durable VPC suppression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saito et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Idiopathic ventricular premature contractions (VPCs) (n=26). Near-field to first-deflection (NF-FD) distance was evaluated on Composite endpoint of ≤5 RF applications and acute success (AUC 0.932, 95% CI 0.837-1.000). A near-field to first-deflection distance ≤8 mm predicted the composite endpoint of ≤5 RF applications and acute success with an AUC of 0.932 (95% CI 0.837-1.000).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: