Key result
Bioprosthetic aortic valve thrombosis complicates ~15% of procedures, necessitating improved diagnostic imaging and follow-up.
Why the study?
The pathogenesis, clinical impact, and long-term consequences of bioprosthetic aortic valve thrombosis remain poorly understood, with unresolved diagnostic and therapeutic issues.
This review highlights the need for improved diagnosis and understanding of bioprosthetic valve thrombosis to determine its clinical consequences and optimal management strategies.
The proliferation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation has alerted clinicians to a specific type of prosthetic degeneration represented by thrombosis. The pathogenesis of this clinical or subclinical phenomenon, which can occur in up to 15% of both surgical and percutaneous procedures, is poorly understood, as is its potential impact on patient prognosis and long-term bioprosthesis durability. Based on this lack of knowledge about the real meaning and importance of bioprosthetic valve thrombosis, the aim of the present review is to draw the clinicians' attention to its existence, starting from the description of predisposing factors that may require a closer follow-up in such categories of patients, to an in-depth overview of all available imaging modalities with their respective pros and cons. Finally, a glimpse into the future of technology and biomarker development is presented. The hope is to increase the rate of bioprosthetic diagnosis, especially of the subclinical one, in order to understand (thanks to a strict and prolonged follow-up) if it can only be considered as an incidental tomographic entity without significant clinical consequences, or, on the contrary, if it is associated with neurological events or accelerated bioprosthetic degeneration. Nevertheless, despite the technical advances of echocardiography and cardiac tomography in terms of accurate bioprosthesis thrombosis detection, several diagnostic and therapeutic issues remain unresolved, including possible prevention strategies, tailored treatment protocols, and follow-up modalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loardi et al. (2024) conducted a review in Bioprosthetic aortic valve thrombosis. Bioprosthetic aortic valve thrombosis was evaluated. Bioprosthetic aortic valve thrombosis can occur in up to 15% of surgical and percutaneous procedures, necessitating improved diagnostic imaging and follow-up to understand its clinical impact.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: