Key result
CAC, carotid plaque, and cIMT equally discriminate prevalent CVD in CKD, outperforming Framingham risk scores.
Why the study?
Risk stratification for cardiovascular disease remains an important challenge in the chronic kidney disease population.
Do noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis (cIMT, carotid plaque, CAC) differ in their ability to discriminate prevalent cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=220)
Do noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis (cIMT, carotid plaque, CAC) differ in their ability to discriminate prevalent cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease?
In patients with chronic kidney disease, noninvasive imaging measures of atherosclerosis (CAC, carotid plaque, and cIMT) perform similarly in discriminating prevalent cardiovascular disease and are superior to the Framingham risk score.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparable performance among CAC, plaque, and cIMT for prevalent CVD in CKD should not yet change practice; leaves open need for prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Despite the significant morbidity and mortality attributable to cardiovascular disease (CVD), risk stratification remains an important challenge in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. We examined the discriminative ability of noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis, including carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), carotid plaque, coronary artery calcification (CAC) and ascending and descending thoracic aorta calcification (TCAC), and Framingham risk score (FRS) to predict self-reported prevalent CVD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Participants were enrolled in the cIMT ancillary study of the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study and also had all of the above measures within an 18-month period. CVD was present in 21% of study participants. C-statistics were used to ascertain the discriminatory power of each measure of atherosclerosis. The study population (n = 220) was 64% male; 51% black and 45% white. The proportion of individuals with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60, 45-59, 30-44, and <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) was 21, 41, 28, and 11%, respectively. In multivariable analyses adjusting for demographic factors, we failed to find a difference between CAC, carotid plaque, and cIMT as predictors of self-reported prevalent CVD (C-statistic 0.70, 95% CI: 0.62-0.78; C-statistic 0.68, 95% CI: 0.60-0.75, and C-statistic 0.64, CI: 0.56-0.72, respectively). CAC was statistically better than FRS. FRS was the weakest discriminator of self-reported prevalent CVD (C-statistic 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant burden of atherosclerosis among individuals with CKD, ascertained by several different imaging modalities. We were unable to find a difference in the ability of CAC, carotid plaque, and cIMT to predict self-reported prevalent CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adeseun et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n=220). Noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis (CAC, carotid plaque, cIMT) vs. Framingham risk score (FRS) was evaluated on Self-reported prevalent cardiovascular disease (C-statistic 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.78). Coronary artery calcification (C-statistic 0.70; 95% CI 0.62-0.78), carotid plaque, and cIMT equally discriminated prevalent cardiovascular disease in CKD, outperforming the Framingham risk score.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: