Key result
Chronically decreased aortic distensibility lowers coronary flow reserve ratio by ~21% during increased ventricular contraction.
Why the study?
The long-term effects of decreased aortic distensibility on coronary perfusion have not been fully investigated.
Comparison
Normal aorta vs decreased aortic distensibility by descending aorta banding
Design
Experimental study with thoracotomy and coronary flow measurements
Follow-up
4 to 6 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Aortic stiffening may impair subendocardial perfusion during stress; hypothesis-generating in animal models and requires human validation.
Absolute Event Rate: 1.9% vs 2.4%
p-value: p=<0.05
Ohtsuka et al. (1994) studied Decreased aortic distensibility (n=12). Decreased aortic distensibility (banding the descending aorta) vs. Normal aorta was evaluated on Coronary flow reserve ratio during isoproterenol infusion (p=<0.05). Chronically decreased aortic distensibility reduced the coronary flow reserve ratio during increased ventricular contraction compared to controls (1.9 vs 2.4, p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: