Key result
Impaired fasting glucose is not associated with increased proximal thoracic aortic stiffness or LV mass.
Why the study?
It was uncertain whether middle-aged and older individuals with impaired fasting glucose exhibit abnormal proximal thoracic aortic stiffness or left ventricular mass compared with healthy counterparts.
Does impaired fasting glucose increase proximal thoracic aortic stiffness and left ventricular mass in middle-aged and older individuals without coronary artery disease?
Observational (n=3,499)
Does impaired fasting glucose increase proximal thoracic aortic stiffness and left ventricular mass in middle-aged and older individuals without coronary artery disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.9% vs 1.91%
p-value: p=0.83
Middle-aged and older individuals with impaired fasting glucose do not exhibit abnormal proximal thoracic aortic stiffness or LV hypertrophy compared to those with normal fasting glucose, unlike those with diabetes.
Impaired fasting glucose shows no link to aortic stiffness or LV mass; leaves open diabetes-specific effects in middle-aged adults without CAD.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether middle-aged and older individuals with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), but no clinical evidence of cardiovascular disease, exhibit abnormal changes in proximal thoracic aortic stiffness or left ventricular (LV) mass when compared with healthy counterparts. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: From the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, 2,240 subjects with normal fasting glucose (NFG), 845 with IFG, and 414 with diabetes, all aged 45 to 85 years and without preexisting coronary artery disease, underwent MRI determinations of total arterial and proximal thoracic aortic stiffness and LV mass. The presence or absence of other factors known to influence arterial stiffness was assessed. RESULTS: After adjustment for clinical factors known to modify arterial stiffness, proximal thoracic aortic stiffness was not increased in those with IFG compared with those with NFG (1.90 +/- 0.05 versus 1.91 +/- 0.04 10(-3) mmHg(-1), respectively, P = 0.83). After accounting for clinical factors known to influence LV mass, LV mass was increased in those with diabetes relative to those with NFG (150.6 +/- 1.4 versus 145.8 +/- 0.81 g, P < 0.0009) but not in those with IFG in comparison with NFG (145.2 +/- 1.03 versus 145.8 +/- 0.81 g, P = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Middle-aged and older individuals with the pre-diabetes state of IFG do not exhibit abnormal proximal thoracic distensibility or LV hypertrophy relative to individuals with NFG. For this reason, an opportunity may exist in those with IFG to prevent LV hypertrophy and abnormal aortic stiffness that is observed in middle-aged and older individuals with diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rerkpattanapipat et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Impaired fasting glucose (n=3,499). Impaired fasting glucose vs. Normal fasting glucose was evaluated on Proximal thoracic aortic stiffness (10(-3) mmHg(-1)) (p=0.83). Impaired fasting glucose was not associated with increased proximal thoracic aortic stiffness (1.90 vs 1.91 10(-3) mmHg(-1); P=0.83) or left ventricular mass compared to normal fasting glucose.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: