Key result
Combining HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II algorithms effectively stratifies ABMR risk in pediatric heart transplant patients.
Why the study?
Few studies have explored the use of HLA molecular mismatch for assessing rejection risk in pediatric heart transplant recipients.
Does the combination of HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II algorithms improve immunologic risk stratification for post-transplant DSA and ABMR in pediatric heart transplant recipients?
Cohort (n=100)
Yes
Does the combination of HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II algorithms improve immunologic risk stratification for post-transplant DSA and ABMR in pediatric heart transplant recipients?
Combining HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II algorithms improves immunologic risk stratification for pediatric heart transplant recipients, potentially facilitating individualized immunosuppression and surveillance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May refine ABMR risk stratification in pediatric heart recipients; leaves open prospective validation before guiding management.
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecular mismatch is a powerful biomarker of rejection. Few studies have explored its use in assessing rejection risk in heart transplant recipients. We tested the hypothesis that a combination of HLA Epitope Mismatch Algorithm (HLA-EMMA) and Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE-II) algorithms can improve risk stratification of pediatric heart transplant recipients. Class I and II HLA genotyping were performed by next-generation sequencing on 274 recipient/donor pairs enrolled in the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation in Children (CTOTC). Using high-resolution genotypes, we performed HLA molecular mismatch analysis with HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II, and correlated these findings with clinical outcomes. Patients without pre-formed donor specific antibody (DSA) (n=100) were used for correlations with post-transplant DSA and antibody mediated rejection (ABMR). Risk cut-offs were determined for DSA and ABMR using both algorithms. HLA-EMMA cut-offs alone predict the risk of DSA and ABMR; however, if used in combination with PIRCHE-II, the population could be further stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. The combination of HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II enables more granular immunological risk stratification. Intermediate-risk cases, like low-risk cases, are at a lower risk of DSA and ABMR. This new way of risk evaluation may facilitate individualized immunosuppression and surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellison et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Pediatric heart transplant (n=100). High HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II molecular mismatch scores vs. Low or intermediate molecular mismatch scores was evaluated on Freedom from antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) based on DQA1/DQB1 molecular mismatch (p=0.0068). Combining HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II algorithms significantly stratified pediatric heart transplant patients into high, intermediate, and low risk groups for developing antibody-mediated rejection (p=0.0068 for DQA1/DQB1).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: