Key result
Demographics influence ICD support preferences, with African Americans favoring written materials and women favoring support groups.
Why the study?
Patients receiving an ICD are diverse, and little is known regarding their preferences for support and education postimplantation.
Cross-Sectional (n=108)
No
Patient preferences for ICD support and education vary significantly by race, gender, and age, suggesting a need for tailored educational approaches to optimize clinical care.
Demographic differences in ICD support preferences support tailored education; leaves open effects on adherence or outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the established treatment for patients with a history of or at risk for sudden cardiac arrest. Patients receiving an ICD are diverse, and little is known regarding their preferences for support and education postimplantation. The purpose of this study was to examine race, gender, and age preferences for receiving support and education (e.g., written, verbal). METHODS: Participants (N = 108, 75% Caucasian, 74% male, age 65 +/- 11 years) completed a research team-designed survey at a regularly scheduled clinic visit with the cardiac electrophysiologist at an academic medical center or offsite clinic. Descriptive statistics, Pearson chi(2), and independent t-tests were conducted. RESULTS: The study demonstrates important associations between race, gender, and age with patient preferences for support and education with regard to ICD care. African Americans preferred written materials (P = 0.006) and a phone call with the cardiologist (P =0.036). Women preferred an ICD support group (P = 0.023), a phone call with the device nurse (P = 0.027), and a professional counselor (P = 0.049). Women's choice to receive education from their cardiologist approached significance (P = 0.055). Patients < or =67 years of age preferred to receive support via an Internet chat room with other ICD patients (P =0.036), and to receive education via an Internet Web site (P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest methods of providing better care to ICD patients by offering them support and educational materials in their preferred modality. These data can aid in optimizing clinical care. Incorporating assessments of individual preferences into future clinical trial design is desirable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serber et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (n=108). Patient demographics (race, gender, age) was evaluated on Preferences for receiving support and education. Patient preferences for ICD support and education varied significantly by demographics, with African Americans preferring written materials (P=0.006) and women preferring support groups (P=0.023).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: