Key result
Elevated NT-pro-BNP linked to ~355% higher in-hospital mortality and improves CACS-RS predictive accuracy in STEMI.
Why the study?
It remained unclear whether combining the Canada Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Score and NT-pro-BNP improves prediction of clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
Does the addition of NT-pro-BNP to the CACS-RS improve the prediction of clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Observational (n=589)
No
Does the addition of NT-pro-BNP to the CACS-RS improve the prediction of clinical outcomes in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
The addition of NT-pro-BNP to the CACS-RS improves the prediction of in-hospital and long-term mortality in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NT-pro-BNP may refine CACS-RS prediction in STEMI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: It remained unclear whether the combination of the Canada Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Score (CACS-RS) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) could have a better performance in predicting clinical outcomes in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: A total of 589 consecutive STEMI patients were enrolled. The potential additional predictive value of NT-pro-BNP with the CACS-RS was estimated. Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality and long-term poor outcomes. RESULTS: The incidence of in-hospital death was 3.1%. Patients with higher NT-pro-BNP and CACS-RS had a greater incidence of in hospital death. After adjustment for the CACS-RS, elevated NT-pro-BNP (defined as the best cutoff point based on the Youden's index) was significantly associated with in hospital death (odd ratio = 4.55, 95%CI = 1.52-13.65, p = 0.007). Elevated NT-pro-BNP added to CACS-RS significantly improved the C-statistics for in-hospital death, as compared with the original score (0.762 vs. 0.683, p = 0.032). Furthermore, the addition of NT-pro-BNP to CACS-RS enhanced net reclassification improvement (0.901, p < 0.001) and integrated discrimination improvement (0.021, p = 0.033), suggesting effective discrimination and reclassification. In addition, the similar result was also demonstrated for in-hospital major adverse clinical events (C-statistics: 0.736 vs. 0.695, p = 0.017) or 3-year mortality (0.699 vs. 0.604, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Both NT-pro-BNP and CACS-RS are risk predictors for in hospital poor outcomes in patients with STEMI. A combination of them could derive a more accurate prediction for clinical outcome s in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2016) conducted an observational in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n=589). Elevated NT-pro-BNP (≥2300 pg/mL) vs. Low NT-pro-BNP (<2300 pg/mL) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 4.55, 95% CI 1.52-13.65, p=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: