Key result
Manual correction of auto-detected contours adds ~5 minutes without meaningfully changing LV volumes or LVEF.
Why the study?
Manual correction of automatically detected myocardial contours in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is time-consuming, and its impact on left ventricular quantitative measurements is unclear.
Does manual contour correction of automatically detected myocardial contours significantly alter quantitative left ventricular parameters in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging?
Observational (n=1,555)
Does manual contour correction of automatically detected myocardial contours significantly alter quantitative left ventricular parameters in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging?
Automatic contour detection for LV functional parameters in CMR can be performed in under 5 minutes, as manual correction significantly increases analysis time with minimal impact on quantitative measurements.
May support omitting routine manual correction in CMR LV analysis to save time; leaves open prospective validation across vendors and populations.
Quantitative analysis of short-axis functional cardiac magnetic resonance images can be performed using automatic contour detection methods. The resulting myocardial contours must be reviewed and possibly corrected, which can be time-consuming, particularly when performed across all cardiac phases. We quantified the impact of manual contour corrections on both analysis time and quantitative measurements obtained from left ventricular short-axis cine images acquired from 1555 participants of the Framingham Heart Study Offspring cohort using computer-aided contour detection methods. The total analysis time for a single case was 7.6 ± 1.7 min for an average of 221 ± 36 myocardial contours per participant. This included 4.8 ± 1.6 min for manual contour correction of 2% of all automatically detected endocardial contours and 8% of all automatically detected epicardial contours. However, the impact of these corrections on global left ventricular parameters was limited, introducing differences of 0.4 ± 4.1 mL for end-diastolic volume, -0.3 ± 2.9 mL for end-systolic volume, 0.7 ± 3.1 mL for stroke volume, and 0.3 ± 1.8% for ejection fraction. We conclude that left ventricular functional parameters can be obtained under 5 min from short-axis functional cardiac magnetic resonance images using automatic contour detection methods. Manual correction more than doubles analysis time, with minimal impact on left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hautvast et al. (2011) reported an observational. Manual contour correction vs. Automatic contour detection was evaluated on Impact on global left ventricular parameters and analysis time. Manual correction of automatically detected myocardial contours added 4.8 ± 1.6 minutes to analysis time but introduced minimal differences in left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: