Key result
Biomarker-guided follow-up linked to ~66% fewer 12-month HF readmissions vs standard care.
Why the study?
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is a major medical and economic problem, and cardiac biomarkers are emerging tools to improve patient management but their impact on outcomes and costs is unclear.
Does a personalized follow-up protocol based on biomarker risk stratification reduce heart failure readmissions in patients with chronic HFrEF?
Observational (n=192)
No
Does a personalized follow-up protocol based on biomarker risk stratification reduce heart failure readmissions in patients with chronic HFrEF?
A personalized follow-up strategy based on biomarker risk stratification significantly reduces hospital readmissions, ED visits, and healthcare costs in patients with chronic HFrEF.
May reduce HF readmissions and costs with biomarker-guided follow-up in HFrEF; leaves open need for randomized trials before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a major and growing medical and economic problem, with high prevalence and incidence rates worldwide. Cardiac Biomarker is emerging as a novel tool for improving management of patients with HF with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: This is a before and after interventional study, that assesses the impact of a personalized follow-up procedure for HF on patient's outcomes and care associated cost, based on a clinical model of risk stratification and personalized management according to that risk. A total of 192 patients were enrolled and studied before the intervention and again after the intervention. The primary objective was the rate of readmissions, due to a HF. Secondary outcome compared the rate of ED visits and quality of life improvement assessed by the number of patients who had reduced NYHA score. A cost-analysis was also performed on these data. RESULTS: Admission rates significantly decreased by 19.8% after the intervention (from 30.2 to 10.4), the total hospital admissions were reduced by 32 (from 78 to 46) and the total length of stay was reduced by 7 days (from 15 to 9 days). The rate of ED visits was reduced by 44% (from 64 to 20). Thirty-one percent of patients had an improved functional class score after the intervention, whereas only 7.8% got worse. The overall cost saving associated with the intervention was € 72,769 per patient (from € 201,189 to € 128,420) and €139,717.65 for the whole group over 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: A personalized follow-up of HF patients led to important outcome benefits and resulted in cost savings, mainly due to the reduction of patient hospitalization readmissions and a significant reduction of care-associated costs, suggesting that greater attention should be given to this high-risk cohort to minimize the risk of hospitalization readmissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
León‐Justel et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=192). Biomarker-guided personalized follow-up vs. Standard care (pre-intervention period) was evaluated on Heart failure readmission rate at 12 months (19.8% absolute reduction, p=<0.001). A biomarker-guided personalized follow-up protocol significantly reduced the 12-month heart failure readmission rate by 19.8% (from 30.2% to 10.4%) compared to standard care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: