Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Identify patient-perceived barriers to head and neck cancer care and compare differences in barriers by country income status. RECENT FINDINGS: Of the 37 articles, 51% ( n = 19) were from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), while 49% ( n = 18) were from high-income countries. Of the papers from high-income countries, unspecified head and neck cancer (HNC) subtype (67%, n = 12) were the most common cancer type, while upper aerodigestive tract mucosal malignancies (58%, n = 11) were more common in LMICs ( P = 0.02). Based on World Health Organization barriers, level of education ( P = < 0.01) and alternative medicine use ( P = 0.04) were greater barriers in LMICs compared to high-income countries. At least 50% of articles listed barriers at all three 'Three Delays' timepoints. There were no significant differences by country income status for the 'Three Delays' timepoints of deciding to seek care ( P = 0.23), reaching the healthcare facility ( P = 0.75), or receiving care ( P = 1.00). SUMMARY: Patients face barriers to care for head and neck cancer regardless of country income status. There is overlap in several barriers and a need for systemic improvement in access. The differences in education and alternative medicine may guide region-specific interventions to improve the provision of head and neck services.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sprow et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: