Prospective multicentre trial demonstrates high technical success and acceptable survival in aortic arch repair, suggesting off-the-shelf modular branched stent-grafts are feasible.
BACKGROUND: Aortic arch pathologies are complex to treat. Alternatives include open surgery, hybrid surgery (endovascular aortic stent-grafting and open surgical debranching procedures) and total endovascular solutions with branched stent-grafts. Branched stent-grafts are the mainstream approach for endovascular repair, but they are primarily available only as dedicated custom-made devices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a non-customized modular aortic arch stent-graft. METHOD: This trial was led by the Chinese PLA General Hospital and 16 additional aortic centres in China. All included patients were treated with a non-customized modular inner branched stent-graft (Endonom Medtech, Hangzhou, China). The study endpoints were 30-day death and stroke, technical success, clinical success, early and late complications, reintervention, and death during follow-up. Follow-up via clinical examination and CT angiography scan were scheduled post surgery at 1, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. RESULTS: From June 2021 to December 2024, a total of 88 patients were enrolled in this study. Technical success rate was 100%. The mean follow-up was 28.6 ± 11.7 months. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 3%, and the 30-day stroke rate was 9%. Overall survival was 91% ± 3%, 86% ± 4%, and 81% ± 4% at 12, 24, and 36 months respectively. A total of 10 patients developed endoleaks, none of which required reintervention. CONCLUSION: Modular branched stent-graft repair for aortic arch disease is feasible and with comparative rates of safety with custom made branched endovascular stent-grafts, hybrid techniques and open surgery. Long-term comparative effectiveness studies are required to establish whether it is superior to alternative interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: