Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multicenter registry shows high technical success in endovascular repair of complex aortic lesions, indicating new device is safe and effective.
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to describe the outcomes of a new custom-made inner-branch device, also suitable as off-the shelf stent graft, for the endovascular repair of complex aortic lesions and to evaluate the results also in narrowed patent aortic lumen (<25 mm) at the level of visceral aorta. METHODS This multicentre study (2021–2024) included patients treated with this new inner-branched device for complex aortic lesions. Endpoints were: technical success, early (<30 days) mortality and late (>30-day) survival, freedom from aorta-related mortality and aortic adverse events and target visceral vessels (TVVs) patency. RESULTS This study included 46 patients and 184 target vessels. Technical success was 100% and no cases of aortic related mortality (ARM) were recorded. Three cases (6.5%) of spinal cord ischaemia were registered. Overall 30-day mortality rate was 8.7%. The mean follow-up was 10.5 ± 9 months. Overall survival rate was 97.4% (95% CI: 76–99) at 3 months, 94% (95% CI: 71–98) at 6 months, 85.1% (95% CI: 54–96) at 12 months and 76% (95% CI: 41–92) at 24 months. Late deaths occurred in 3 patients (8.3%) after a median of 8 months (IQR, 4–12 months). No late aortic related mortality, type I or III endoleak were registered. The primary bridge-stent patency was 98.9% (95% CI: 73–99). No late spinal cord ischaemia (SCI) were registered. The subgroup characterized by narrow aortic patent lumen did not showed bridge-stent instability, reintervention, death and aortic related mortality. CONCLUSIONS Endovascular repair of TAAAs and complex aortic lesions with this new custom/off-the shelf stent graft was technically safe and effective with promising results both in elective and urgent cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: