Key result
Micral-Test shows up to ~92% sensitivity vs nephelometry for screening microalbuminuria in hypertension.
Why the study?
The prevalence of elevated urinary albumin levels is significantly greater in hypertensive than in normotensive subjects, necessitating evaluation of a new dipstick test for microalbuminuria.
Does a new dipstick test (Micral-Test) accurately screen for microalbuminuria compared to nephelometry in patients with hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=171)
No
Does a new dipstick test (Micral-Test) accurately screen for microalbuminuria compared to nephelometry in patients with hypertension?
p-value: p=< .001
The Micral-Test is a sensitive and convenient screening tool for detecting microalbuminuria in hypertensive patients, supported by its high negative predictive value.
May support Micral-Test screening in hypertension; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
The prevalence of elevated urinary albumin levels is significantly greater in hypertensive than in normotensive subjects. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of a new dipstick test for microalbunimuria (the Micral-Test), 171 hypertensive patients were studied at a union-sponsored hypertension treatment program. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and correlation coefficients between urinary albumin concentration results obtained by the Micral-Test and by nephelometry were determined in three urine samples. Sensitivity values of the Micral-Test, compared with 24-h nephelometry, were 81%, 75%, and 92% in a 24-h, overnight, and random sample, respectively. Specificity values were 89%, 90%, and 63% in the three samples, respectively. Positive predictive value ranged from 41% to 67%, whereas negative predictive value ranged from 93% to 97%. Correlation coefficients between the logarithms of albumin concentrations obtained from the three different urine specimens using nephelometry fell between 0.71 and 0.78, whereas those obtained with the Micral-Test fell between 0.49 and 0.71, and across techniques, 0.29 to 0.53 (all P < .001). Results obtained with both nephelometry and the Micral-Test using overnight and random urine collections approximated those obtained with 24-h collection. These results, coupled with the ease and convenience of both specimen collection and the Micral-Test itself, support the use of the test as a valuable screening tool for microalbuminuria in patients with hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gerber et al. (1998) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=171). Micral-Test vs. 24-h nephelometry was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity of the Micral-Test for microalbuminuria (p=< .001). The Micral-Test demonstrated sensitivity of 75-92% and specificity of 63-90% compared to 24-hour nephelometry, supporting its use as a screening tool for microalbuminuria in hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: