Key result
This study protocol describes a planned randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether a peer-led educational intervention improves time in therapeutic range for patients on vitamin K antagonists; no results are available yet.
Why the study?
Approximately 33% of patients on vitamin K antagonists have prothrombin time values outside the recommended range, increasing thromboembolic or hemorrhagic risk.
Does a peer-to-peer didactic intervention improve time in therapeutic range in patients taking vitamin K antagonists with poor INR control?
RCT (n=312)
Single-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does a peer-to-peer didactic intervention improve time in therapeutic range in patients taking vitamin K antagonists with poor INR control?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This protocol outlines a randomized trial to evaluate whether a peer-led educational intervention can improve INR control in patients on vitamin K antagonists with poor time in therapeutic range.
BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulant drugs represent an essential tool in the prevention of thromboembolic events. The ones in widespread use are vitamin K antagonists, whose plasma level is monitored by measuring prothrombin time using the international normalized ratio. If its values are out of the recommended range, the patient will have a higher risk of suffering from thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications. Previous research has shown that approximately 33% of patients keep having values at an inappropriate level. The purpose of the proposed study is to improve the international normalized ratio control results by a joint didactic intervention based on the Junta de Andalucía School for Patients method that will be implemented by anticoagulated patients themselves. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial will be undertaken at primary care centers from one healthcare area in Málaga (Andalusia, Spain). STUDY POPULATION: patients participating in an oral anticoagulant therapy program of vitamin K antagonists. First step: identification of patients in the oral anticoagulation therapy program with international normalized ratio control of the therapeutic level at 65% or less over total time. Second step: patients with international normalized ratio (INR) control figures under 2 or above 3 will be assigned to two different groups: Group 1 or joint intervention group: patients will be instructed in the joint didactic "from peer to peer," by a previously trained and expert anticoagulant patient. Group 2 or control group: the control group will receive the usual clinical practice. They will be evaluated by nurses about once a month, except for cases in which their INR figures are under 2 or above 3, and those patients will be evaluated more frequently. A total of 312 individuals will be required (156 in each group) to detect differences in INR figures equal to or higher than 15% between the groups. STUDY VARIABLES: time on therapeutic levels before and after the intervention; sociodemographic variables; vital signs; the existence of cardiovascular risk factors or accompanying diseases in the clinical records; laboratory test including complete blood counts, bleeding time, and prothrombin time or partial thromboplastin time; and blood chemistry, other prescribed drugs, and social support. A quasi-experimental analytic study with before-after statistical analysis of the intervention will be conducted. Linear regression models will be applied for the main variable results (international normalized ratio value, time on therapeutic level) inputting sociodemographic variables, accompanying diseases, and social support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03647254 . Registered on 27 August 2018.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ginel-Mendoza et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Inappropriate INR control on vitamin K antagonists (n=312). Joint didactic educational intervention (Junta de Andalucía School for Patients method) vs. Usual clinical practice was evaluated on Time on INR therapeutic levels in the last 6 months of receiving VKA treatment. This study protocol describes a planned randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether a peer-led educational intervention improves time in therapeutic range for patients on vitamin K antagonists; no results are available yet.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: