Key result
Proposed indication-based diagnostic reference levels for pediatric CT utilize weight- and age-based exponential curves.
Why the study?
Indication-based national diagnostic reference levels for common paediatric CT examinations were lacking to guide dose optimization.
Observational (n=1,000)
Yes
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The study proposes new indication-based national diagnostic reference levels for pediatric CT that account for patient weight and age, offering targets that are generally lower than those in other countries.
Indication-based national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for a few most common paediatric computed tomography (CT) examinations are proposed. Patient dose data (CTDI vol and dose length product) were collected for over 1000 patients in 4 university hospitals with best experiences in paediatric CT. Four indications for chest CT and two for abdomen (abdomen + pelvis), chest + abdomen and head CT were considered. The DRLs for the body examinations are proposed as exponential DRL-curves, where CTDI vol and dose length product are presented as a function of patient weight. The same DRL curve applies to all the indications studied. The basic 75 % level curve is supplemented by 50 % level curve to enable considerations on varying levels of technology. For head CT, DRLs are proposed for a few age groups (1, 1-5, 5-10 and 10-15 y), separately for routine CT and CT for ventricular size. The proposed DRLs are generally lower than the few published DRLs in other countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Järvinen et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Paediatric computed tomography (CT) examinations (n=1,000). Paediatric CT examinations was evaluated on Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) based on CTDI vol and dose length product. Indication-based national diagnostic reference levels for paediatric CT were proposed as exponential curves based on patient weight for body examinations and age groups for head CT.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: