Key result
Abnormal ABI predicts ~300% higher risk of major vascular events after acute ischemic stroke.
Why the study?
The prognostic value of abnormal ankle brachial index for stroke recurrence in patients with acute ischaemic stroke was not well established.
Does an abnormal ankle brachial index predict stroke recurrence and new vascular events in patients with acute ischaemic stroke?
Observational (n=456)
Does an abnormal ankle brachial index predict stroke recurrence and new vascular events in patients with acute ischaemic stroke?
Hazard Ratio: 3.99 (95% CI 1.9–8.41)
Absolute Event Rate: 50% vs 17%
p-value: p=< 0.001
An abnormal ankle brachial index (≤ 0.9) is a strong, independent predictor of recurrent stroke and major vascular events in patients presenting with acute ischaemic stroke.
May support ABI screening for prognosis in acute ischaemic stroke; leaves open whether targeted interventions reduce events.
Background: The ankle brachial index (ABI) is a known measure of lower‐limb peripheral artery disease (PAD), as well as a marker for other cardiovascular disease events. Objective: Our goal was to compare the prevalence of abnormal ABI scores (ABI ≤ 0.9) between: consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke (IS), primary care patients with refractory hypertension (rHT), and patients at intermediate cardiovascular risk (ICVR). Also, to determine the prognostic value of abnormal ABI for stroke recurrence in patients with IS. Methods: We compared 116 consecutive patients with IS with 190 rHT and 150 ICVR patients. Clinical data and ultrasonographic findings were recorded. Stroke recurrence and risk of new vascular events were assessed after 18 months of follow‐up. Results: Low ABI was more frequent in rHT (35.8%) than in the IS (24.1%) and ICVR (24.7%) groups (P = 0.031). Amongst patients with IS, ABI ≤ 0.9 was associated with vascular risk factors (VRF) ≥3 (33.8% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.001) and large‐artery atherosclerosis (LAA) (43.5% vs. 19.4%, P = 0.015). Multivariate analyses (logistic regression) only identified VRF > 3 as independently associated with low ABI (OR: 6.46; 1.81‐23.02; P = 0.004). Abnormal ABI was associated with stroke recurrence (32.1% vs. 13.6%, P = 0.027) and the appearance of any major vascular event (50.0% vs. 17.0%, P < 0.001). In the logistic regression analysis, adjusted for VRF, age, and LAA, ABI remained as an independent predictor of vascular events (HR 3.99; 1.90–8.41 P < 0.001). Conclusion: Abnormal ABI was associated with classical risk factors, especially hypertension. The measurement of ABI amongst patients with IS appeared to be useful to identify high‐risk patients and plan adequate prevention therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Purroy et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Acute ischaemic stroke (n=456). Abnormal ankle brachial index (ABI ≤ 0.9) vs. Normal ABI was evaluated on Appearance of any major vascular event (HR 3.99, 95% CI 1.90-8.41, p=< 0.001). An abnormal ankle brachial index (≤0.9) in patients with acute ischaemic stroke independently predicted major vascular events over 18 months (50.0% vs 17.0%; HR 3.99, 95% CI 1.90-8.41, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: