Key result
FFR >0.90 after plain balloon angioplasty is linked to ~3-fold fewer two-year coronary events.
Why the study?
Coronary angiography alone is not sensitive enough to identify patients with a low restenosis chance after PTCA, and combining angiographic and functional criteria may better distinguish these patients.
Does a high fractional flow reserve (>0.90) after plain balloon angioplasty predict a lower incidence of coronary events in patients undergoing PTCA?
Cohort (n=85)
Does a high fractional flow reserve (>0.90) after plain balloon angioplasty predict a lower incidence of coronary events in patients undergoing PTCA?
Coronary pressure measurement (FFR) after plain balloon angioplasty can identify patients with optimal functional results who have a low risk of long-term coronary events and may safely avoid stenting.
May identify low-risk patients after PTCA; leaves open whether FFR can safely guide stent deferral.
Although coronary stents have been the most important improvement in percutaneous coronary interventions in the last 10 years, it is well known to interventionalists that many patients after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) have a favourable outcome without stenting. Coronary angiography, however, is not sensitive enough to identify those particular patients and it has been suggested that a combination of angiographic and functional criteria would be more suitable to distinguish patients with a low restenosis chance after plain balloon angioplasty. In the present study, the authors investigated the value of coronary pressure measurement for conditional stenting in 85 patients. It was demonstrated that in patients in whom a high fractional flow reserve (FFR) was present (> 0.90), the incidence of coronary events at two-year follow-up was almost three times lower than in those patients with an FFR below 0.90. Such high FFRs could be obtained in approximately 45% of all patients. In an additional group of patients, it was demonstrated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies that the mechanism of a high FFR after plain balloon angioplasty is most likely the result of a larger lumen compared with patients with a suboptimal FFR. This means that, in patients in whom both the angiographic and the functional result after PTCA is optimal, a restenosis rate is achieved similar to that achieved by stenting. Obviously, in such patients, additional stenting and a number of problems in the long-term possibly related to stenting can be avoided. Therefore, coronary angiography and coronary pressure measurement have a complementary value in the evaluation of PTCA results and such information can be easily obtained by using a pressure wire instead of a regular guidewire.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bech et al. (2001) conducted a cohort in Post-percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (n=85). High fractional flow reserve (FFR > 0.90) vs. FFR < 0.90 was evaluated on Coronary events. A high fractional flow reserve (>0.90) after plain balloon angioplasty was associated with an almost three times lower incidence of coronary events at two years compared to an FFR <0.90.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: