Key result
Add-on pacing lead implantation provides an effective alternative to ICD lead replacement for pacing failure.
Why the study?
Long-term reliability of ICD leads remains a significant problem with no clear consensus on treatment strategy for ICD lead failure.
Case Report (n=1)
Add-on pacing lead implantation may serve as an effective and safe alternative to full lead replacement in patients with ICD pacing failure.
May inform individualized ICD lead failure management in pacing-dependent patients; leaves open optimal strategies pending larger studies.
Despite recent advances in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) technology, the long-term reliability of ICD leads remains a significant problem. Lead failures constitute a major risk for patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. There is no clear consensus on treatment strategy of ICD lead failure and decision should be individualized. We report a pacing-dependent elderly male with ICD lead pacing failure secondary to insulation break resulting in recurrent syncope. We emphasize the technique of "Add-on pacing lead implantation" could be an effective and alternative to ICD lead replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2012) conducted a case report in ICD lead pacing failure (n=1). Add-on pacing lead implantation was evaluated. Add-on pacing lead implantation was an effective alternative to ICD lead replacement in a pacing-dependent elderly male with ICD lead pacing failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: