Key result
Rural ACHD patients face greater outpatient care barriers vs urban dwellers, including ~77-mile driving distances.
Why the study?
Adults with congenital heart disease face unique challenges accessing specialized care, with rural patients potentially experiencing greater barriers that are not well characterized.
Cross-Sectional (n=100)
No
Financial impact and distance to clinic are major barriers to outpatient cardiac care for adults with congenital heart disease, with rural patients facing significantly greater financial and geographic challenges.
Rural adults with CHD face greater financial, distance, and insurance barriers to care; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve access or outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) face a unique set of medical, psychological, and social challenges, and access to specialised adult congenital heart disease care has been associated with improved outcomes. Rural adults with CHD may represent a uniquely disadvantaged group given additional challenges when accessing specialised care. The aim of this study was to investigate the challenges faced by adults with CHD in accessing outpatient cardiac care, with a specific focus on understanding differences between urban- and rural-dwelling patients. METHODS: This cross-sectional, survey-based study took place in the adult congenital heart disease clinic at an urban academic medical center. Additional medical information was abstracted in a retrospective manner from the electronic health record. In addition to descriptive statistics, t-tests and Chi-square tests were performed to investigate differences between urban and rural dwelling patients. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients participated in the study (mean age 40 ± 13 years, 60% female, 18% rural dwelling). Across the total sample, the median driving distance to clinic was 20 miles (interquartile range 12-77); it was 15 miles for urban dwellers and 77 miles for rural dwelling patients (p < 0.001). The most commonly identified barriers to cardiac clinic visits were financial losses related to taking time off from work (39%), distance of clinic from home (33%), and weather (33%). Compared to urban dwelling patients, on average those who were rural dwelling had a lower level of education (p = 0.04), more difficulty paying insurance premiums (p < 0.001) and copays (p = 0.005), and were more likely to identify the distance from clinic (p = 0.05) and having to go into the city (p = 0.02) as barriers to clinic appointments. CONCLUSIONS: The financial impact and distance to clinic were the most commonly identified barriers to outpatient cardiac care in this cohort of adults with CHD. These barriers, along with difficulty paying insurance premiums, are more common in rural dwelling patients. Initiatives such as telemedicine visits or providing financial subsidies for travel and treatment could help to expand specialty adult congenital heart disease care and better serve this growing patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study conducted a cross-sectional in congenital heart disease (n=100). Rural dwelling vs. Urban dwelling was evaluated on Barriers to outpatient cardiac care. Rural dwelling adults with congenital heart disease faced greater barriers to outpatient care than urban dwellers, including longer driving distances (77 vs 15 miles, P<0.001) and financial challenges.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: