Key result
Systematic review protocol aims to identify transitional care quality indicators for COPD and HF.
Why the study?
There are no widely accepted indicators to assess the quality of transitional care following hospitalisation for COPD and heart failure despite its high-risk nature.
What are the transitional care quality indicators and their associations with clinical, patient-reported, and cost outcomes for patients with COPD and/or HF?
Systematic Review
What are the transitional care quality indicators and their associations with clinical, patient-reported, and cost outcomes for patients with COPD and/or HF?
This protocol outlines a systematic review to identify and evaluate transitional care quality indicators for patients with COPD and heart failure following hospital discharge.
Protocol on transitional care quality indicators in COPD/HF published; leaves open associations with outcomes until results emerge.
INTRODUCTION: The period following hospitalisation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or heart failure (HF)-when patients transition between settings and clinicians-is one of high risk. Transitional care services that bridge the gap from hospital to home can improve outcomes, but there are no widely accepted indicators to assess their quality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this systematic review, we will summarise transitional care quality indicators, and describe their associations with clinical, patient-reported and cost outcomes. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and HealthSTAR, as well as grey literature and reference lists of included articles. We will screen all studies published between January 1990 and October 2019 that test an intervention that aims to improve the hospital-to-home transition for patients with COPD and/or HF; and measure at least one process (eg, medication errors), clinical (eg, hospital readmissions) or patient-reported (eg, health-related quality of life) outcome which will serve as a transitional care quality indicator . We will include randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, interrupted time series studies and before-after studies. We will extract data in duplicate and classify transitional care quality indicators as structural, process-related or outcome-related. When possible, we will assess associations between transitional care quality indicators and clinical outcomes. In anticipation of conceptual and statistical heterogeneity, we will provide a qualitative synthesis and narrative review of the results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review will provide a list of transitional care quality indicators and their associations with clinical outcomes. These results can be used by hospitals, administrators and clinicians for assessing the quality of transitional care provided to patients with COPD and HF. The findings can also be used by policy-makers to assess and incentivise transitional care quality. We will disseminate results through publications, social media releases and presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered on PROSPERO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael et al. (2019) conducted a systematic review in Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (HF). Transitional care services was evaluated on Transitional care quality indicators and their associations with clinical, patient-reported and cost outcomes. This is a systematic review protocol to identify transitional care quality indicators and their associations with clinical outcomes for patients with COPD and heart failure; no results are available.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: