Key result
DART-MS/MS rapidly quantifies anti-arrhythmic drugs with ~99% correlation to conventional LC-MS/MS.
Why the study?
Therapeutic drug monitoring is necessary for optimal administration of anti-arrhythmic drugs, but rapid simultaneous quantification methods are needed.
Does DART-MS/MS provide accurate and rapid quantification of anti-arrhythmic drugs in human serum compared to LC-MS/MS?
Does DART-MS/MS provide accurate and rapid quantification of anti-arrhythmic drugs in human serum compared to LC-MS/MS?
Effect estimate: R = 0.9929
DART-MS/MS allows for rapid (30 seconds per sample) and accurate quantification of five anti-arrhythmic drugs in human serum, facilitating efficient therapeutic drug monitoring.
DART–MS/MS enables rapid multi-drug TDM in serum; leaves open clinical validation before routine use.
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is necessary for the optimal administration of anti-arrhythmic drugs in the treatment of heart arrhythmia. The present study aimed to develop and validate a direct analysis in real time tandem mass spectrometry (DART–MS/MS) method for the rapid and simultaneous determination of five anti-arrhythmic drugs (metoprolol, diltiazem, amiodarone, propafenone, and verapamil) and one metabolite (5-hydroxy(OH)-propafenone) in human serum. After the addition of isotope-labeled internal standards and protein precipitation with acetonitrile, anti-arrhythmic drugs were ionized by DART in positive mode followed by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) detection. The use of DART–MS/MS avoided the need for chromatographic separation and allowed rapid and ultrahigh throughput analysis of anti-arrhythmic drugs in a total run time of 30 s per sample. The DART–MS/MS method yielded satisfactory linearity (R2 ≥ 0.9906), accuracy (86.1–109.9%), and precision (≤ 14.3%) with minimal effect of biological matrixes. The method was successfully applied to analyzing 30 clinical TDM samples. The relative error (RE) of the concentrations obtained by DART–MS/MS and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) was within ± 13%. This work highlights the potential usefulness of DART for the rapid quantitative analysis of anti-arrhythmic drugs in human serum and gives rapid feedback in the clinical TDM practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gui et al. (2020) studied Heart arrhythmia (n=30). DART-MS/MS vs. LC-MS/MS was evaluated on Correlation of drug concentrations measured by DART-MS/MS versus LC-MS/MS (R = 0.9929). DART-MS/MS rapidly quantified five anti-arrhythmic drugs in human serum within 30 seconds per sample, demonstrating high correlation (R = 0.9929) and equivalent accuracy to conventional LC-MS/MS.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: