Key result
A nine-predictor XGBoost model predicts HFpEF risk in COPD patients with an AUC of ~0.90.
Why the study?
Early identification of HFpEF risk in COPD patients is critical for timely intervention but lacks accurate and interpretable predictive models.
Does an XGBoost machine learning model accurately predict HFpEF risk in COPD patients?
Observational (n=1,550)
No
Does an XGBoost machine learning model accurately predict HFpEF risk in COPD patients?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.898 (95% CI 0.867-0.929)
An XGBoost machine learning model using nine clinical predictors, most notably NT-proBNP, can accurately predict the risk of concurrent HFpEF in patients with COPD.
May support ML-based HFpEF risk stratification in COPD; leaves open external validation and prospective outcome trials.
BACKGROUND: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) frequently coexist, leading to increased hospitalization, mortality, and healthcare burden. Early identification of HFpEF risk in COPD patients is critical for timely intervention. AIM: To develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for predicting HFpEF risk in COPD patients and to identify key predictors using explainable artificial intelligence techniques. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 1,550 COPD patients, divided into COPD-only and COPD-HFpEF groups. Feature selection was performed using LASSO regression, logistic regression, and Boruta random forest. Ten ML models were developed and evaluated on an internal test set, with the best model further validated on an external cohort (n = 69). Model interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). RESULTS: Nine predictors were consistently selected: NT-proBNP, red blood cell count, fibrinogen, cholesterol, arterial PaO₂, inspiratory capacity (IC), IC% predicted, late diastolic mitral inflow velocity (A wave), and CAT score. The XGBoost model achieved the best performance, with an AUC of 0.898 (95% CI: 0.867-0.929) on the internal test set and 0.819 (95%CI: 0.713 - 0.924) on external validation. SHAP analysis identified NT-proBNP as the most influential predictor. CONCLUSION: The developed XGBoost model accurately predicts HFpEF risk in COPD patients and offers clinically interpretable insights into key predictive markers, supporting early identification and stratified management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) (n=1,550). XGBoost machine learning model (using 9 clinical predictors) was evaluated on Prediction of HFpEF risk (Area Under the Curve) (AUC 0.898, 95% CI 0.867-0.929). An XGBoost machine learning model incorporating nine clinical predictors accurately predicted the risk of HFpEF in COPD patients, achieving an AUC of 0.898 on the internal test set.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: