Key result
3D echocardiography shows excellent agreement with MDCT for quantifying end-diastolic aortic root volume within ~0.5 mL.
Why the study?
The accuracy of three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography for quantifying aortic root geometry compared with cardiac multi-detector computed tomography was not established.
Does 3D transthoracic echocardiography accurately quantify aortic root geometry compared to multi-detector computed tomography in patients with normal LVEF?
Observational (n=23)
No
Does 3D transthoracic echocardiography accurately quantify aortic root geometry compared to multi-detector computed tomography in patients with normal LVEF?
Mean Difference: 0.5
Absolute Event Rate: 13.6% vs 14.1%
3D transthoracic echocardiography is a feasible and accurate method for assessing aortic root geometry compared to MDCT.
Supports 3D echocardiography for aortic root volumetry in normal LVEF; leaves open outcome validation and diseased-valve assessment.
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography has been reported to be valuable for evaluating the geometry of cardiac chambers. We validated the accuracy of 3D transthoracic echocardiography for quantifying aortic root geometry in comparison with cardiac multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). METHODS: Twenty-three patients who underwent cardiac MDCT and showed normal left ventricular ejection fraction (> 55%), as assessed by 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography, were enrolled (12 male, mean 53 ± 9 years). We defined the aortic root volume as the volume from the aortic annulus to the sinotubular junction. The aortic root volume at end-diastole measured by both cardiac MDCT and 3D echocardiography was assessed. RESULTS: The cross-sectional area of the aortic root was asymmetric. At the annulus level, the cross-sectional area showed asymmetric triangle. From the aortic annulus to the most dilated point of the sinus of Valsalva, the asymmetric triangular shape was maintained. From the most dilated point of the sinus of Valsalva to the sinotubular junction, the cross-sectional shape of the aortic root changed to oval. The average aortic root volumes measured by 3D echocardiography (ARV-3DE) were 13.6 ± 4.8 mL at end-diastole and 14.1 ± 5.3 mL at end-systole, respectively. The average aortic root volume measured by MDCT at end-diastole (ARV-CT) was 14.1 ± 5.7 mL. At end-diastole, the ARV-3DE correlated well with the ARV-CT (R(2) = 0.926, difference = 0.5 ± 1.7 mL), and the two methods were in excellent agreement (the percent difference was 0%). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate both the feasibility and accuracy of 3D echocardiography for the clinical assessment of the geometry of the aortic root.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Normal left ventricular ejection fraction (n=23). Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography vs. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) was evaluated on Aortic root volume at end-diastole (Mean difference 0.5 mL). Three-dimensional echocardiography demonstrated excellent agreement with multi-detector computed tomography for quantifying end-diastolic aortic root volume (mean difference 0.5 mL, R2 = 0.926).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: