Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are a bridge to heart transplantation (HT). Given limited donor organs, assessment of risk of waitlist mortality is important for waitlist prioritization for HT. We sought to derive and validate a risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in LVAD patients. Methods: Adult patients with a continuous-flow, centrifugal, durable LVAD listed or likely to be listed for HT in the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) were included. The outcome was time to all-cause mortality within 2 years from implant. We considered 41 candidate predictors at 3 months post-implant. Univariate Fine-Gray models and 4 logistic regression techniques (logistic, LASSO, random forest, gradient boosting) were used to select variables for a final survival model using the Fine-Gray method. The model was validated in INTERMACS and in an independent cohort (European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support [EUROMACS]). Model discrimination and calibration were evaluated. Results: The INTERMACS cohort included 2364 patients with 268 (11%) deaths. A risk prediction model for waitlist mortality at 2 years was derived with area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.77). The EUROMACS cohort included 577 patients with 70 (12%) deaths. The model AUC was 0.62 (95% CI 0.55-0.70). The model predicted waitlist mortality when divided into low-, medium-, or high-risk groups in the INTERMACS (p<0.001) and EUROMACS (p=0.0099) cohorts. Conclusions: We derived and validated a risk prediction model for waitlist mortality in LVAD patients using 2 independent cohorts. Our risk assessment model can inform HT prioritization in LVAD patents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tibrewala et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: