Key result
Developing CHF after NSTE-ACS is linked to ~240% higher mortality and increased MI risk.
Why the study?
There are limited data regarding the incidence and clinical significance of congestive heart failure in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
Does the development of congestive heart failure worsen clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes?
Population
10,141 patients with unstable angina or NSTEMI in the OASIS-2 trial
Comparison
Patients developing CHF vs patients not developing CHF
Design
Cohort study of patients randomized to hirudin or unfractionated heparin
Follow-up
6 months
Authors
Loading...
CHF after NSTE-ACS marks substantially worse prognosis; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes in this high-risk group.
Cohort (n=10,141)
Yes
Does the development of congestive heart failure worsen clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes?
Odds Ratio: 3.4 (95% CI 2.7–4.3)
The development of congestive heart failure in patients with non-ST segment elevation ACS is common and strongly associated with increased mortality and recurrent MI, yet these patients are less likely to receive invasive management.
Mehta et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) (n=10,141). Congestive heart failure (CHF) vs. No congestive heart failure was evaluated on Death (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.7-4.3). Developing congestive heart failure after non-ST segment elevation ACS was associated with increased risk of death (OR 3.4; 95% CI 2.7-4.3) and new MI (OR 2.8; 95% CI 2.2-3.6).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: