Key result
Diabetes is not associated with higher 12-month TLR risk after sirolimus-coated balloon PCI.
Why the study?
Outcomes of PCI in diabetic patients remain suboptimal and it is unclear if diabetic patients benefit from drug-coated balloons.
Does diabetes mellitus increase the risk of target lesion revascularization in patients undergoing PCI with a sirolimus-coated balloon compared to non-diabetic patients?
Observational (n=2,083)
Open-label
Yes
Does diabetes mellitus increase the risk of target lesion revascularization in patients undergoing PCI with a sirolimus-coated balloon compared to non-diabetic patients?
Hazard Ratio: 1.38 (95% CI 0.91–2.08)
Absolute Event Rate: 6.5% vs 4.7%
The use of sirolimus-coated balloons in diabetic patients undergoing PCI shows comparable target lesion revascularization rates to non-diabetic patients at 12 months.
Diabetes did not significantly raise TLR after SCB PCI; leaves open SCB benefit versus stents in diabetics pending RCTs.
BACKGROUND: The outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetic patients are still suboptimal, and it is unclear if diabetic patients might derive a benefit from the use of drug-coated balloons. AIMS: To evaluate the impact of diabetes mellitus on the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI with sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) MagicTouch (Concept Medical, India). METHODS: We conducted a subgroup analysis of the prospective, multicenter, investigator-initiated EASTBOURNE registry, evaluating the performance of MagicTouch SCB in patients with and without diabetes. The study primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12-month follow-up. Secondary clinical endpoints were major adverse clinical events (MACE), death, myocardial infarction (MI), and BARC 2-5 bleedings. RESULTS: Among 2,083 enrolled patients, a total of 864 suffered from diabetes (41.5%). Patients with diabetes had a numerically higher occurrence of TLR (6.5% vs. 4.7% HR 1.38, 95%CI 0.91-2.08), all-cause death (3.8% vs. 2.6%, HR 1.81, 95%CI 0.95-3.46), and MACE (12.2% vs. 8.9%; HR 1.26 95%CI 0.92-1.74). The incidence of spontaneous MI was significantly higher among diabetic patients (3.4% vs. 1.5%, HR 2.15 95%CI 1.09-4.25); bleeding events did not significantly differ. The overall incidence of TLR was higher among in-stent restenosis (ISR) as compared to de-novo coronary lesions, irrespectively from diabetes status. CONCLUSIONS: In the EASTBOURNE DIABETES registry, diabetic patients treated with the MagicTouch SCB did not have a significant increase in TLR when compared to non-diabetic patients; moreover, diabetic status did not affect the study device performance in terms of TLR, in both de-novo lesions and ISR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caiazzo et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=2,083). Diabetes mellitus vs. Non-diabetic patients was evaluated on Target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12-month follow-up (HR 1.38, 95% CI 0.91-2.08). In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with a sirolimus-coated balloon, diabetes mellitus did not significantly increase the risk of target lesion revascularization at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: