Key result
5G cardiac telerehabilitation improves VO2max by ~2.8 ml/min/kg over center-based rehab in acute MI.
Why the study?
Poor acceptance and adherence to center-based cardiac rehabilitation due to time and cost issues impact rehabilitation effectiveness, prompting interest in home-based and telerehabilitation approaches.
Does cardiac telerehabilitation via a 5G Internet of Things platform improve physiological and psychological indicators compared to center-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with acute myocardial infarction post-PCI?
RCT (n=50)
Single-blind
permuted-block randomization
No
Does cardiac telerehabilitation via a 5G Internet of Things platform improve physiological and psychological indicators compared to center-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with acute myocardial infarction post-PCI?
Mean Difference: 2.79 (95% CI 2.29–3.29)
Absolute Event Rate: 19.32% vs 16.52%
p-value: p=0.001
A 5G Internet of Things platform for cardiac telerehabilitation effectively improved physiological outcomes compared to center-based rehabilitation in post-PCI myocardial infarction patients.
Supports 5G IoT telerehabilitation as a preferable option to center-based programs post-AMI; extends RCT evidence for remote cardiac rehabilitation delivery.
Owing to issues such as time and cost, patients often show poor acceptance of and adherence to center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR), which impacts the effectiveness of rehabilitation. Therefore, there is growing interest in home-based cardiac rehabilitation and cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR), which entail less time and cost than CBCR. This study aimed to compare the changes in physiological and psychological indicators, compliance, and satisfaction after CTR and CBCR. In this single-blind, randomized, controlled trial, the intervention group received CTR via the 5G Internet of Things platform, while the control group received CBCR. Data from 50 patients (age 66.28 ± 4.01 years) with acute myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were analyzed. After an intervention period of three months, the maximal oxygen uptake and metabolic equivalent of task were 5.53 ± 0.12 and 19.32 ± 0.17, respectively, in the intervention group, and 4.15 ± 0.13 and 16.52 ± 0.18, respectively, in the control group. After three months of intervention, there were significant differences between the two groups in all observed indicators (p < 0.05), except for low-density lipoprotein and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (p > 0.05). The use of a 5G Internet of Things platform cardiac rehabilitation model effectively improved outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Trials registry: The study protocol was registered at Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR), first trial registration 07/08/2023, identification number ChiCTR2300074435.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Acute myocardial infarction post-percutaneous coronary intervention (n=50). Cardiac telerehabilitation via 5G Internet of Things platform vs. Center-based cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) (MD 2.79, 95% CI 2.29-3.29, p=0.001). Cardiac telerehabilitation using a 5G Internet of Things platform significantly improved maximal oxygen uptake (MD 2.79 ml/min/kg) compared to center-based rehabilitation in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: