Key result
Elevated LV mechanical dispersion identifies ventricular arrhythmias in MVP patients with ~87% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Mitral valve prolapse is generally considered benign but can be accompanied by ventricular arrhythmias, and the predictive value of left ventricular mechanical dispersion for arrhythmias is unclear.
Does left ventricular mechanical dispersion predict ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mitral valve prolapse?
Cross-Sectional (n=63)
Does left ventricular mechanical dispersion predict ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mitral valve prolapse?
p-value: p=<0.001
Left ventricular mechanical dispersion and mitral annular disjunction measured by speckle tracking echocardiography can help predict ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mitral valve prolapse presenting with palpitations.
Background: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is considered a benign disorder, although it can be accompanied by ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) can be a promising tool for detecting early derangement. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine whether the left ventricular (LV) mechanical dispersion (MD) derived by STE can be considered a predictor for occurrence of VA in patients with MVP. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted on 63 patients with MVP (37 women and 29 men) presented with palpitation. The patients were divided into two groups: arrhythmic patients with VA (Group 1) and non-arrhythmic patients (Group 2). All of them underwent comprehensive clinical and electrocardiographic examination, cardiac rhythm assessment by Holter monitoring, and comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation including speckle tracking technique. Results: VA were detected in 32 of 63 patients. Ventricular bigeminy was the most common type of VA in arrhythmic patients. Unlike other echocardiographic parameters, the LV MD and the mitral annular disjunction (MAD) were found to be significantly higher in arrhythmic versus non-arrhythmic MVP patients ( P < 0.001). Furthermore, the mean LV MD was higher in patients with frequent ventricular ectopics versus infrequent ones ( P = 0.003). The cutoff value for LV MD was 35.1 ms or higher (sensitivity 87%, specificity 71%) and for MAD it was 2.7 mm or higher (sensitivity 82%, specificity 60%) in predicting VA in patients with MVP. Conclusions: LV MD in addition to MAD can be implemented in risk prediction for VA in patients with MVP presenting with palpitations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-shehristani et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Mitral valve prolapse with palpitations (n=63). Left ventricular mechanical dispersion (LV MD) was evaluated on Occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) (p=<0.001). Left ventricular mechanical dispersion ≥35.1 ms predicted ventricular arrhythmias in patients with mitral valve prolapse with 87% sensitivity and 71% specificity (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: