Key result
High thrombus burden is linked to ~133% greater risk of slow/no reflow during STEMI PCI.
Why the study?
Quantitative evaluation of high thrombus burden as an independent predictor of slow/no reflow phenomenon during primary PCI in STEMI patients was needed.
Does high thrombus burden predict slow/no reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Cross-Sectional (n=747)
No
Does high thrombus burden predict slow/no reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI?
Odds Ratio: 2.33 (95% CI 1.6–3.39)
Absolute Event Rate: 39.7% vs 20.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
High thrombus burden (Grade ≥4) is a significant independent predictor of intra-procedural slow/no reflow during primary PCI for STEMI.
May inform risk stratification during primary PCI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Aim of this study was to perform quantitative evaluation of high thrombus burden (Grade ≥4) as an independent predictor of slow/no reflow phenomenon during primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: In this analytical cross-sectional study we included consecutive patients who have undergone primary PCI for STEMI at a tertiary care cardiac center of the Pakistan. High thrombus burden was defined as angiographic thrombus grade ≥4. The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow rate < III was defined as slow/no reflow phenomenon. Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis for slow/no reflow phenomenon were reported as odds ratio (OR). RESULTS: This analysis included 747 patients, 78.2% (584) patients were male and mean age was 55.82±11.54 years. High thrombus burden was observed in 68.1% (509) of the patients. Slow/no reflow phenomenon was observed in 33.6% (251) which was more common among patients in high thrombus burden group, 39.7% (202/509) vs. 20.6% (49/238); p<0.001. Adjusted OR of thrombus Grade ≥ 4 was 2.33 [1.6 -3.39]; p<0.001. Other significant variables were female gender (1.51 [1.01 -2.27]; p=0.045), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) ≥20 mmHg (2.34 [1.69 -3.26]; p<0.001), total lesion length ≥20 cm (1.54 [1.09-2.16]; p=0.014), and neutrophil count ≥8.8 cells/μL (1.72 [1.22 -2.43]; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: High thrombus burden (Grade ≥4) is a significant and an independent predictor of the slow/no reflow phenomenon. While predicting slow/no reflow phenomenon, thrombus burden should be given due importance along with other significant factors such as gender, LVEDP, lesion length, and neutrophil counts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=747). High thrombus burden (Grade ≥4) vs. Low thrombus burden (Grade <4) was evaluated on Slow/no reflow phenomenon (TIMI flow rate < III) (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.6-3.39, p=<0.001). High thrombus burden (Grade ≥4) was an independent predictor of intra-procedural slow/no reflow phenomenon during primary PCI for STEMI (adjusted OR 2.33).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: