Key result
Hospitals overestimating door-to-needle performance show ~36% lower actual rates of timely tPA administration.
Why the study?
The ability of US hospitals to meet guidelines for intravenous tPA door-to-needle time within 60 minutes remains suboptimal, and it is unclear whether hospitals accurately perceive their performance rates.
Do hospital staff accurately perceive their institution's performance in delivering timely tPA for acute ischemic stroke?
Cross-Sectional (n=141)
Yes
Do hospital staff accurately perceive their institution's performance in delivering timely tPA for acute ischemic stroke?
Hospital staff frequently overestimate their institution's ability to deliver timely tPA for acute ischemic stroke, highlighting the need for routine comparative performance feedback.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hospitals may misperceive DTN performance; leaves open whether objective benchmarking improves tPA timeliness in stroke.
BACKGROUND: Timely thrombolytic therapy can improve stroke outcomes. Nevertheless, the ability of US hospitals to meet guidelines for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) remains suboptimal. What is unclear is whether hospitals accurately perceive their rate of tPA "door-to-needle" (DTN) time within 60 minutes and how DTN rates compare across different hospitals. METHODS AND RESULTS: DTN performance was defined by the percentage of treated patients who received tPA within 60 minutes of arrival. Telephone surveys were obtained from staff at 141 Get With The Guidelines hospitals, representing top, middle, and low DTN performance. Less than one-third (29.1%) of staff accurately identified their DTN performance. Among middle- and low-performing hospitals (n=92), 56 sites (60.9%) overestimated their performance; 42% of middle performers and 85% of low performers overestimated their performance. Sites that overestimated tended to have lower annual volumes of tPA administration (median 8.4 patients [25th to 75th percentile 5.9 to 11.8] versus 10.2 patients [25th to 75th percentile 8.2 to 17.3], P=0.047), smaller percentages of eligible patients receiving tPA (84.7% versus 89.8%, P=0.008), and smaller percentages of DTN ≤60 minutes among treated patients (10.6% versus 16.6%, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitals often overestimate their ability to deliver timely tPA to treated patients. Our findings indicate the need to routinely provide comparative provider performance rates as a key step to improving the quality of acute stroke care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Acute Ischemic Stroke (n=141). Overestimation of door-to-needle (DTN) performance vs. Accurate or underestimation of DTN performance was evaluated on Percentage of DTN ≤60 minutes among treated patients (p=0.002). Hospitals that overestimated their door-to-needle performance had significantly lower actual rates of tPA administration within 60 minutes compared to other hospitals (10.6% vs 16.6%, P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: