Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recent empirical work on US governments indicates an asymmetry in the flypaper effect: the elasticity of public spending with respect to changes in grants differs significantly for positive and negative changes. Using a panel of data on Flemish municipalities covering the period 1989–1996, we also find clear evidence of asymmetrical reactions. More precisely, the results suggest the presence of a fiscal replacement type of asymmetry: when grants grow, municipalities spend most of the additional revenue. However, when grants fall, spending is unaffected and municipalities compensate the loss through additional taxation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruno Heyndels (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: