Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Critical-mineral trade-network assessments are sensitive to product classification and to how simultaneous disruptions are modelled. Using import-reported UN Comtrade data for 2014–2023, this paper examines product-scope sensitivity and cascade vulnerability in rare-earth-related midstream and permanent-magnet trade networks. An external audit shows that Australian HS253090 trade closely tracks official lithium-concentrate exports, so this code is excluded from rare-earth network inference. The primary comparison uses HS284690 rare-earth compounds and HS850511 metal permanent magnets, with broader baskets retained as sensitivity checks. Under the central stress-test specification, a China-origin disruption generates larger conditional node-failure fractions in HS850511 than in HS284690 under baseline procurement (48.6% versus 20.8%) and procurement stress (86.3% versus 52.8%). These percentages are conditional stress-test outputs rather than estimates of realized disruption. The downstream–midstream ordering holds across all 16 combinations in the procurement-stress parameter grid. Matched-scale destination rewiring shows that cascade exposure can change substantially even when China’s total export value, export degree, and shipment-size distribution are fixed. Exporter concentration alone is therefore insufficient to characterize supply-chain vulnerability; product definition and bilateral dependence also matter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: