Key result
The baseline E/(Ea × Sa) index significantly predicted nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 6 months, with an AUC of 0.89 for the lateral measurement (P≤0.01).
Why the study?
Identification of CRT nonresponders using simple and objective parameters is needed to tailor treatment in heart failure patients.
Does the E/(Ea × Sa) index predict nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients?
Observational (n=33)
Does the E/(Ea × Sa) index predict nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.89 for lateral E/(Ea × Sa)
p-value: p=≤.01
The novel tissue Doppler index E/(Ea × Sa) may serve as a useful echocardiographic predictor for identifying patients unlikely to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
OBJECTIVE: Identification of patients who are nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with the use of simple and objective parameters may be helpful in tailoring treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate whether E/(Ea × Sa) could be a predictor of CRT nonresponders (E = early diastolic transmitral velocity, Ea = early diastolic mitral annular velocity, Sa = systolic mitral annular velocity). METHODS: In total, 53 heart failure patients were evaluated for this study, and 33 patients were included according to the study criteria. Before and 6 months after CRT-D(CRT with a defibrillator) implantation, E, Ea, and Sa were determined at the medial and lateral mitral annular sites, and the average values were obtained. E/(Ea × Sa) was calculated (medial, lateral, average). The patients were followed for 6 months to monitor their CRT response. A responder was defined as a patient with a reduction in end-systolic volume of ≥15% and an increase in 6-minute walking distance of 50 m. RESULTS: At a 6-month follow-up, 24 (72.7%) of the 33 patients responded to CRT. At the 6-month follow-up, in the responder group, the E/Ea ratio, lateral mitral, and average E/(Ea × Sa) indices were significantly reduced (P < .01 for all). The baseline lateral mitral, medial mitral, and average E/(Ea × Sa) indices were significantly lower in the responder group than in the nonresponder group (P ≤ .01 for all). The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that all the E/(Ea × Sa) indices predict the CRT nonresponder patients. The AUC values were 0.89 (lateral E/(Ea × Sa)), 0.85 (average E/(Ea × Sa)), and 0.77 (medial E/(Ea × Sa)) (P ≤ .01 for all). CONCLUSION: We found that the E/(Ea × Sa) index is a novel predictor of CRT nonresponder patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arı et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=33). E/(Ea × Sa) index was evaluated on CRT nonresponder (lack of reduction in end-systolic volume of ≥15% and increase in 6-minute walking distance of 50 m) (AUC 0.89 for lateral E/(Ea × Sa), p=≤.01). The baseline E/(Ea × Sa) index significantly predicted nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy at 6 months, with an AUC of 0.89 for the lateral measurement (P≤0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: