Key result
CHPchf questionnaire correlates strongly with MLHFQ to measure heart failure health status.
Why the study?
The validity and reliability of a new disease-specific quality of life questionnaire for patients with heart failure, the CHPchf, needed to be studied.
Is the Cardiac Health Profile congestive heart failure (CHPchf) questionnaire a valid and reliable tool for assessing quality of life in patients with heart failure?
Observational (n=83)
Is the Cardiac Health Profile congestive heart failure (CHPchf) questionnaire a valid and reliable tool for assessing quality of life in patients with heart failure?
The CHPchf is a valid and reliable disease-specific questionnaire for assessing quality of life in patients with congestive heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support CHPchf in HF quality-of-life assessment; leaves open responsiveness and outcome prediction in trials.
OBJECTIVE: To study the validity and reliability of the new disease-specific extension of the CHP, Cardiac Health Profile congestive heart failure (CHPchf), used to assess QoL specifically for patients with heart failure. METHODS: Eighty-three consecutive patients with chronic heart failure were enrolled. Criteria and construct validity were studied by correlating the Global Mean Score (GMS) for the CHPchf with the total sum score of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and other measures predicted to correlate with QoL. Reliability was evaluated on the basis of internal consistency. RESULTS: Significant correlations for CHPchf were found with MLHFQ (r=0.76, p= <0.0001), the Boston Heart Failure Score (BHFS) (p<0.001), the generic second section of the CHP, maximal workload at exercise test (p<0.05) and the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification (p<0.01). Cronbach's alpha was calculated to 0.82. CONCLUSIONS: CHPchf was shown to be valid and reliable. CHPchf has favourable psychometric properties. Further studies are needed to explore its discriminative abilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mannheimer et al. (2007) conducted an observational in chronic heart failure (n=83). Cardiac Health Profile congestive heart failure (CHPchf) questionnaire vs. Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) was evaluated on Correlation of Global Mean Score (GMS) for the CHPchf with the total sum score of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) (r=0.76, p=<0.0001). The Cardiac Health Profile congestive heart failure (CHPchf) questionnaire demonstrated strong validity, correlating with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: