Key result
Warfarin achieves suboptimal anticoagulation control with a mean time in therapeutic range of ~48%.
Why the study?
Warfarin was frequently prescribed for long-term anticoagulation before novel oral anticoagulants, but anticoagulation control quality in this setting was unclear.
Cohort (n=113)
No
Anticoagulation quality with warfarin in this tertiary care setting was suboptimal (mean TTR 48.1%), highlighting the need for improved management strategies.
Suboptimal TTR with warfarin warrants monitoring caution in similar settings; leaves open generalizability and intervention effects in broader cohorts.
Background: Warfarin was a frequently prescribed long-term anticoagulant before the advent of novel oral anticoagulants or direct oral anticoagulants. These drugs are used for the primary or secondary prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation or for the treatment and prophylactic prevention of venous thromboembolism. This study aimed to assess the anticoagulation control of patients receiving warfarin at a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in an anticoagulation clinic at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia and included 113 patients who had been treated with warfarin for at least 3 months. Thereafter, the international normalized ratio results were collected for 3 years. Anticoagulation control was assessed by calculating time within the therapeutic range (TTR) as per the Rosendaal method. Results: A total of 113 patients (mean age, 56 ± 17.6 years; 64.6% of females) were included. The mean TTR was 48.1%. Almost one-third of the patients (31.3%) had poor anticoagulation control defined as a TTR of <50%. Poor anticoagulation control was significantly associated with a higher CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, and stroke/transient ischemic attack) score ( P = 0.043). TTR did not differ significantly between men and women, and it was not associated with age or anticoagulation therapy duration. Conclusion: Anticoagulation quality was suboptimal in patients receiving warfarin in a tertiary care hospital, with nearly 41% of time spent outside the therapeutic range. Methods should be implemented to improve anticoagulation control in appropriate patient groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bshabshe et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Patients receiving warfarin (n=113). Warfarin was evaluated on Time within the therapeutic range (TTR). Warfarin therapy in a tertiary care hospital resulted in suboptimal anticoagulation control, with a mean time in therapeutic range of 48.1%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: