Key result
Capillary point-of-care total cholesterol yields similar results to venous sampling.
Why the study?
The relationship between cholesterol determinations in venous and capillary samples using the CR3000 PoC system was not well established.
Does capillary blood sampling provide similar cholesterol measurements compared to venous sampling using the CR3000 PoC system in adult volunteers?
Population
21 unselected adult volunteers with no exclusion criteria
Comparison
Capillary blood sampling vs venous blood sampling for cholesterol measurement using CR3000
Design
Observational study
Authors
Loading...
Comparable results support capillary sampling flexibility with CR3000; leaves open prospective validation before routine adoption.
Observational (n=21)
Does capillary blood sampling provide similar cholesterol measurements compared to venous sampling using the CR3000 PoC system in adult volunteers?
Absolute Event Rate: 168% vs 164%
p-value: p=<0.05
The CR3000 point-of-care system provides comparable and accurate total cholesterol measurements using either capillary or venous blood samples.
Sblendorio et al. (2008) reported an observational. Capillary blood sampling using CR3000 vs. Venous blood sampling using CR3000 was evaluated on Total cholesterol concentration (p=<0.05). Capillary blood sampling for total cholesterol using the CR3000 system yielded similar results to venous sampling (168 mg/dL vs 164 mg/dL), with statistically similar variance (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: