Key result
Remote secondary prevention programs cut anxiety and depression while improving QoL versus standard advice.
Why the study?
Quality of life and psychological well-being are primary treatment goals in CHD, but the impact of secondary prevention programs with remote support on these measures in CHD patients with abdominal obesity is not well assessed.
Do secondary prevention programs incorporating remote support improve psychological well-being and quality of life in patients with stable CHD and abdominal obesity?
RCT (n=120)
Open-label
randomized
Do secondary prevention programs incorporating remote support improve psychological well-being and quality of life in patients with stable CHD and abdominal obesity?
Secondary prevention programs incorporating remote support via phone calls or text messages significantly improve psychological well-being and quality of life in obese patients with stable CHD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Remote support programs may warrant integration into obese CHD secondary prevention; extends RCT evidence for telehealth on psychosocial outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Quality of life, which is determined both by the physical symptoms and by psychosocial risk factors, is among the primary treatment goals in coronary heart disease (CHD). Therefore, it is reasonable to assess the impact of any therapeutic interventions in CHD on these measures. AIM: To assess the changes of psychological status and quality of life in patients with CHD and abdominal obesity (AO) over time during 2 secondary prevention programs using two different modalities of remote support. METHODS: An open-label randomized study with 3 parallel groups enrolling hospitalized patients with stable CHD and AO (most hospitalizations were due to elective revascularization procedures). The patients were randomized into 2 intervention groups (Group I and Group II) and into Group III (control). Both intervention groups received secondary prevention programs including one in-hospital preventive counselling session with focus on healthy eating habits and subsequent remote support for 6 months (Month 1 to 3: once a week; Month 4 to 6: once a month). Group I received this subsequent counselling via phone calls and Group II received text messages via different platforms according to patient preferences. Group III received standard advice at discharge only. During 1 year of follow-up motivation for lifestyle changes and continued participation in secondary prevention programs, anxiety and depression symptoms (HADS), stress levels (10-point VAS) and quality of life (HeartQol) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were enrolled (mean age±SD, 57.75±6.25 years; men, 83.4%) who had a high baseline motivation to participate in preventive programs. At 1 year of follow-up there was a substantial improvement in anxiety and depression symptoms in Groups I and II which was absent in Group III. As a result, the proportion of patients with HADS-A score ≥8 dropped from 45.0% to 10.0% in Group I and from 40.0% to 7.5% in Group II (both р values <0.01 vs control), and the proportion of participants with HADS-D ≥8 decreased from 30.0% to 10.0% (р<0.01 vs control) and from 12.5% to 0% (р<0.05 vs control), respectively. Stress level decreased in Groups I and II by 3.95±0.38 and 3.56±0.39 баллов, respectively (both р values <0.01 vs control). The HeartQol global score increased by 1.07±0.08 points in Group I and by 0.98±0.13 points in Group (both р values <0.01 vs control). CONCLUSION: Both secondary prevention programs with long-term remote support targeting obese CHD patients resulted in improvement of pivotal measures of their psychological status i.e. into a decline of anxiety and depression symptomatology, stress reduction and into a better quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pogosova et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Coronary heart disease and abdominal obesity (n=120). Secondary prevention programs with remote support vs. Standard advice at discharge only was evaluated on Proportion of patients with HADS-A score ≥8 (p=<0.01). Secondary prevention programs with remote support via phone or text significantly reduced anxiety (P<0.01) and depression (P<0.05) symptoms and improved quality of life compared to standard advice.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: