Key result
Female sex is linked to ~38% lower risk of ventricular arrhythmias or death vs. males.
Why the study?
Sex differences in the incidence of appropriate ICD therapies for ventricular arrhythmias and death in patients with ischemic heart disease were not well characterized in MADIT-CRT.
Does female sex influence the risk of ventricular arrhythmias or death compared to male sex in patients receiving ICD or CRT-D therapy?
Cohort (n=1,790)
Yes
Does female sex influence the risk of ventricular arrhythmias or death compared to male sex in patients receiving ICD or CRT-D therapy?
Hazard Ratio: 0.62
Absolute Event Rate: 21% vs 35%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Women receiving ICD or CRT-D therapy have a significantly lower risk of ventricular arrhythmias or death compared to men, though appropriate shock therapy is a stronger predictor of subsequent death in women.
May inform sex-specific VA risk counseling in ICD/CRT-D recipients; extends observational data but leaves open causal impact on device benefit.
INTRODUCTION: Studies suggest that women with ischemic heart disease are less likely to experience appropriate ICD therapies for ventricular arrhythmias (VT/VF). We evaluated the influence of sex on arrhythmic events or death in subjects enrolled in MADIT-CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Arrhythmic event rates, defined as VT/VF treated with defibrillator therapy or all-cause death, were determined among 1,790 subjects enrolled in MADIT-CRT with documented 3-year follow-up. Predictors of VT/VF/death were identified using multivariate analysis. Ninety-one (21%) women and 466 (35%) men experienced VT/VF/death over the follow-up period. The overall probability of VT/VF/death was significantly lower in women versus men (HR 0.62; P < 0.001). The probability of VT/VF/death was the lowest in women with ischemic heart disease (HR 0.51; P = 0.003). In ICD subjects, the 3-year risk of VT/VF was lower in ischemic women versus men (P = 0.021), and in nonischemic women versus men (P = 0.049). The probability of VT/VF/death was significantly lower in women (HR 0.52; P = 0.007) and men (HR 0.74; P = 0.018) with LBBB who received CRT-D. Appropriate shock therapy strongly correlated with increased risk of death during postshock follow-up in women (HR 5.18; P = 0.001) and men (HR 1.63; P = 0.033); interaction P value of 0.034. CONCLUSION: In this substudy of MADIT-CRT, sex, etiology of heart disease and type of device implanted significantly influenced subsequent risk for VT/VF or death. Women with ischemic heart disease and women with LBBB who received CRT-D had the lowest incidence of VT/VF or death when compared to men. Appropriate shock therapy was a strong predictor of death, particularly in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tompkins et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Heart disease with indication for ICD/CRT-D (MADIT-CRT population) (n=1,790). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Arrhythmic events (VT/VF treated with defibrillator therapy) or all-cause death (HR 0.62, p=< 0.001). Female sex was associated with a significantly lower 3-year probability of ventricular arrhythmias or death compared to male sex (21% vs 35%; HR 0.62; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: