Key result
Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty fails to produce lasting hemodynamic relief for calcific aortic stenosis.
Why the study?
The anatomical and haemodynamic effects of percutaneous balloon dilatation in elderly patients with calcified aortic stenosis were not fully characterized.
Does percutaneous balloon dilatation improve anatomical and haemodynamic parameters in elderly patients with calcific aortic stenosis?
Comparison
Before and after percutaneous balloon dilatation
Design
Observational cohort study
Authors
Loading...
Balloon dilatation rarely alters calcified aortic valves visibly; leaves open its role in nonsurgical candidates pending prospective data.
Observational (n=40)
Does percutaneous balloon dilatation improve anatomical and haemodynamic parameters in elderly patients with calcific aortic stenosis?
Percutaneous balloon dilatation for calcific aortic stenosis provides only transient haemodynamic improvement, with gradients returning to severe levels within a week.
Commeau et al. (1988) conducted an observational in Calcific aortic valve stenosis (n=40). Percutaneous balloon dilatation vs. Baseline (pre-dilatation) was evaluated on Anatomical valvar/annular changes and haemodynamic gradient across the aortic valve. Percutaneous balloon dilatation for calcific aortic stenosis produced no anatomical change in 20 of 26 patients, and while initial haemodynamics improved, gradients returned to severe levels by 8 days.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: