Key result
STEMI from DES thrombosis shows no independent increase in in-hospital death or recurrent MI.
Why the study?
There are little data comparing the in-hospital outcomes of patients presenting with STEMI due to drug-eluting stent thrombosis versus de novo coronary artery disease.
Does STEMI due to DES-ST worsen in-hospital composite of death or recurrent MI in patients undergoing primary PCI compared to STEMI due to de novo CAD?
Cohort (n=985)
Does STEMI due to DES-ST worsen in-hospital composite of death or recurrent MI in patients undergoing primary PCI compared to STEMI due to de novo CAD?
Hazard Ratio: 1.18 (95% CI 0.53–2.63)
Absolute Event Rate: 12.7% vs 7.4%
p-value: p=0.38
Patients with STEMI secondary to DES-ST have poorer in-hospital outcomes than those with de novo CAD, largely driven by baseline comorbidities rather than DES-ST itself.
BACKGROUND: Despite significant advances in stent technology and pharmacotherapy, drug-eluting stent thrombosis (DES-ST) remains a major complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and commonly presents as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). There are currently little data comparing the in-hospital outcomes of patients presenting with STEMI due to DES-ST with those due to de novo coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Our study comprised 985 consecutive patients who underwent primary PCI for STEMI, 102 of whom were diagnosed as having a definite DES-ST. The primary end-point was the in-hospital composite of death or recurrent myocardial infarction (MI). The secondary end-point was the in-hospital maximum rise in creatine kinase (myocardial band [MB] fraction) and troponin I. RESULTS: The DES-ST group had a higher proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, history of ischemic heart disease, coronary revascularization, and chronic renal impairment. The adjusted primary end-point was higher in the DES-ST cohort (12.7% vs. 7.4%; P = 0.05). The 2 cohorts did not differ in the secondary end-point. The independent predictors of the primary end-point were age (hazard ratio [HR]= 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]= 1.01 - 1.06; P = 0.005), cardiogenic shock (HR = 11.5; 95% CI = 6.38 - 20.07, P < 0.001), and lesions involving the left anterior descending coronary artery (HR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.03 - 3.13, P = 0.04). DES-ST was not an independent predictor of the primary end-point (HR = 1.18; 95% CI = 0.53-2.63, P = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with STEMI secondary to DES-ST have a poorer in-hospital outcome than do patients in whom STEMI is due to de novo CAD. This difference may be predominantly driven by differences in the baseline characteristics between these cohorts. (J Interven Cardiol 2011;24:320-325).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belle et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=985). Drug-eluting stent thrombosis (DES-ST) vs. de novo coronary artery disease (CAD) was evaluated on in-hospital composite of death or recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.53-2.63, p=0.38). STEMI due to drug-eluting stent thrombosis had higher in-hospital death or recurrent MI than de novo CAD (12.7% vs 7.4%), but was not an independent predictor (HR 1.18; 95% CI 0.53-2.63; P=0.38).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: